From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCD33C433EF for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB80925E4; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:21:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz CB80925E4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1638372135; bh=D58/6QGqnnVxmXKUhpKUqCmH6MS+vp6LBDiBbA6uGo4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=GEbDsoi24CsX13vjfrUn2rog8+4CudYPHlQBBjs437HrA6/9zbyqcGpUG2UAKGqR1 2o4hpv49VNdbh2vh5Rp49kIbirI5B8YH3dKm7yjBvbosWEsbfK/Fh6j9CclSEwjmWV 4dbG7UOvuqabz3YXPYcKDV93t84lnpoYJSvB7nP0= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667CFF80240; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:21:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id E3154F80246; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:21:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04AFAF80217 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:21:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 04AFAF80217 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kl3KRwAS" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27583B81FE7; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40DA4C53FCC; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:21:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1638372077; bh=D58/6QGqnnVxmXKUhpKUqCmH6MS+vp6LBDiBbA6uGo4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kl3KRwASmPVgL/nH9VPiSPynx1Xer46raq4kVVmFWUlE0gT/0QQjnOyHu6W6OwJoa 8Tj2wjSwFC20fS9vckRQpGCL1LF9layRWja7gSg/JgiuPSPOPOucN7RJ7T5vnFbMU8 UxEUcQ5wPTNfGJ3ZTloSPE9qlV9OQIQvDmWiKCoe/AEtnb61KcdImhEQL/U4WhBiDP ePld6PO1bkNQPehzLrWfT7hHkOIa8/3wUtH84JvmLwDpHlVVELgNvSmFMaSWQUBsTo tJbN2C6zRcW5o80SpqMd2LzS2wD3JHsy7ybHOh3RvUUKGRhVr4Q9ElD0gsMpDiEyjF AlX4qUeFreRBQ== Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:21:13 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Ricard Wanderlof Subject: Re: [RESEND, PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: sound: tlv320adc3xxx: New codec driver Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E+YjiY8Ir+JvjXPZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: All true wisdom is found on T-shirts. Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , alsa-devel , Rob Herring , Liam Girdwood X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --E+YjiY8Ir+JvjXPZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:09:17PM +0100, Ricard Wanderlof wrote: >=20 > DT bindings for tlv320adc3xxx driver, currently supporting > Texas Instruments TLV320ADC3001 and TLV320ADC3101 audio ADCs. I realise that the threading is broken on all your patch serieses (it would be good to fix this) but please don't send isolated patches from a series separately in the middle of pending review for the series, it just makes things even harder to follow since now there's two different groups of patches and they're not even grouped by sending date. --E+YjiY8Ir+JvjXPZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmGnkugACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CoPAf9GtGPHt7BObhWyxMnKRZn9j9gDytFFXLfrfAokadiEtMvEz4mkmLht4lD mmb18xtiFJayuJHfZF+ExMIKPtDq1jzJx4KKKrhDUUSy+lVQp6VHnEcWbtfsVWVz 4wxxDgx5cGQtKEBTe1WQOA3Sk0gyEmKf+E5fbeoqf1R+Us0727zovObWBXwtvSuj FL8DMSnUCPyby895QzH2eRK0O7wisLZRN97wU4kiIUEwihrGx8vu8d0p38fwg62U IHt9lsq79dosqWjcK56dhNdRHPe6y43AlmYHzItJJ/kI7bHKR+OCm7Wxj86pRRvv u0X+ImSUACqr48IccSWVwkg2/1KIMg== =du47 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E+YjiY8Ir+JvjXPZ--