From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64129C433F5 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 13:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD6FB17ED; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 14:35:58 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz CD6FB17ED DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1647005808; bh=3w2+xqDZNMpp9s+ES1A/ibvQ0ZTOcFvQcvIC2U+pkTY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=oPxbkBhvFKaZnan/qWoUixNJW6ZRgeaSh5EwEg47hRNMS5EI3MmcNzWLGJTat5o3I BzBUwk0KAa44P313CUY7fwk7ziTSg2IT68hy7fSPdl/2/cUJl4vun6IQSXkVf6QMc1 050x3OKqFLs9OQiCZZpQbDsJUhEQvreCzNIapcng= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6789BF801D8; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 14:35:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id C8D94F80238; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 14:35:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3A73F80085 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 14:35:50 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz D3A73F80085 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Hp2HvGHu" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 434CAB82B6E; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 13:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0F8CC340E9; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 13:35:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1647005748; bh=3w2+xqDZNMpp9s+ES1A/ibvQ0ZTOcFvQcvIC2U+pkTY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Hp2HvGHue01M9aAI1AxfZ8iSyByzPEJMMH69/eiSZQ1gxGmBjT/9ceFjWWhG6KW4w Z8UdBgEOoVqPWhoeFgxpL7nXn9BMqlKSpZjXo/mW2fjKAqGgmX9k2DVYLRDP2sS8uB TcEz8GEIv1/kE3LT1pADonrblWxdE9CyaZebS+RZDsGsin5WneJulkgdv3tDux7VNT RseO0gptnxh/xccN3xR7rtUGEVvJMBc2I+WF5Lb9gWsucvDmlO8Zur9rvayM/u8nI6 f2Tx/rIArXFDCpNFPvhbOSfXzKVDhjSweB/7tYJ4qszlBAwJ2QXSQszYM1CBTIgKr+ Ik/qGjLQOo2fw== Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 13:35:42 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Sameer Pujar Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ASoC: rt5659: Expose internal clock relationships Message-ID: References: <5c531e7c-58e4-2c55-57cb-85eff68b0927@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8wZvnWaTLkzb2sYl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5c531e7c-58e4-2c55-57cb-85eff68b0927@nvidia.com> X-Cookie: A fool and his money are soon popular. Cc: oder_chiou@realtek.com, robh@kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tiwai@suse.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --8wZvnWaTLkzb2sYl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 08:29:26PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote: > Yes, it would be required and I will include it in v2. In this series, I > wanted to get some initial feedback if the idea is right. It looks plausible. --8wZvnWaTLkzb2sYl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmIrUC0ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CiCAf9E0eqTsp3uhv/jiRjqxZnSq6Jy4IVm/W/bCSx1hf9JQr7YPQOE1LAQF42 LTlskNZzOyyOPckwauOS4rLiD0mn5Ht8wsEi7PikMpYDa18l0h9j17MLxGCHTtrm YAdUR1hcXhMGEXZeICyOc9lFL5+Y2pUEgxThXnRvo4VWCJwegyTm0rw05cAzVe+U FPdXhB/R+TtcHbGB4a+cHbUs/PsmFyS/Tps0IQZXSzyB3hFEwlTFAs7/czml3HPO x4cBwLRDFyIB+1OTaF6vyfH28gYyJYO8elFHKBbLKBS/m3Kf60Th04c7142gE939 YlkFwkK8LWMXUkwFQ1QAYaxhNuV9DQ== =iCaa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8wZvnWaTLkzb2sYl--