Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: max98396: add amplifier driver

[Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2123 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 05:40:24PM -0700, Ryan Lee wrote:

This looks mostly good - some issues below but nothing structural.

> +	switch (fmt & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_INV_MASK) {
> +	case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_NB_NF:
> +	case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_NB_IF:
> +		break;

One of these must be wrong - the device needs to know if it's handling a
normal or inverted frame clock, otherwise the audio will be corrupted.  

> +static int max98396_mux_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> +			    struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> +{
> +	struct snd_soc_component *component =
> +		snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
> +	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm = snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_dapm(kcontrol);
> +	struct max98396_priv *max98396 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
> +	struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
> +	unsigned int *item = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item;
> +	int reg, val;
> +
> +	if (item[0] >= e->items)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	val = snd_soc_enum_item_to_val(e, item[0]) << e->shift_l;
> +
> +	if (max98396->device_id == CODEC_TYPE_MAX98396)
> +		reg = MAX98396_R2055_PCM_RX_SRC1;
> +	else
> +		reg = MAX98397_R2056_PCM_RX_SRC1;
> +
> +	regmap_update_bits(max98396->regmap, reg,
> +			   MAX98396_PCM_RX_MASK, val);
> +
> +	snd_soc_dapm_mux_update_power(dapm, kcontrol, item[0], e, NULL);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

This should return 1 if the value changed - you should get an error
reported by mixer-test from selftests if you run them on a sound card
with the driver.

> +	/* L/R mix configuration */
> +	if (max98396->device_id == CODEC_TYPE_MAX98396) {
> +		regmap_write(max98396->regmap,
> +			     MAX98396_R2055_PCM_RX_SRC1, 0x02);
> +		regmap_write(max98396->regmap,
> +			     MAX98396_R2056_PCM_RX_SRC2, 0x10);
> +	} else {
> +		regmap_write(max98396->regmap,
> +			     MAX98397_R2056_PCM_RX_SRC1, 0x02);
> +		regmap_write(max98396->regmap,
> +			     MAX98397_R2057_PCM_RX_SRC2, 0x10);
> +	}

Shouldn't these be user controllable?  Most of the setup being done here
looks system specific, especially the routing stuff.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]