From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com,
cujomalainey@google.com, ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, senozhatsky@chromium.org,
broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: SOF: ipc3-topology: Correct get_control_data for non bytes payload
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:08:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmlAOm7AlZGpQLPS@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220427124025.14615-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
On (22/04/27 15:40), Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> It is possible to craft a topology where sof_get_control_data() would do
> out of bounds access because it expects that it is only called when the
> payload is bytes type.
> Confusingly it also handles other types of controls, but the payload
> parsing implementation is only valid for bytes.
>
> Fix the code to count the non bytes controls and instead of storing a
> pointer to sof_abi_hdr in sof_widget_data (which is only valid for bytes),
> store the pointer to the data itself and add a new member to save the size
> of the data.
>
> In case of non bytes controls we store the pointer to the chanv itself,
> which is just an array of values at the end.
>
> In case of bytes control, drop the wrong cdata->data (wdata[i].pdata) check
> against NULL since it is incorrect and invalid in this context.
> The data is pointing to the end of cdata struct, so it should never be
> null.
>
> Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Hi,
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Drop the cdata->data check against NULL as it is not a valid test and since we
> are in sof_get_control_data() the memory has been already allocated
>
> changes since v1:
> - adjust the payload size for non bytes controls by subtracting the size of the
> sof_ipc_ctrl_data struct, plus add comment to note this
A corresponding 5.10 backport that "works on my computer".
I also have a 5.4 backport but it's entirely untested.
---
sound/soc/sof/topology.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/topology.c b/sound/soc/sof/topology.c
index c1fc7bcf4eb5..04a721f9a7f9 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/topology.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/topology.c
@@ -50,7 +50,8 @@
struct sof_widget_data {
int ctrl_type;
int ipc_cmd;
- struct sof_abi_hdr *pdata;
+ void *pdata;
+ size_t pdata_size;
struct snd_sof_control *control;
};
@@ -2100,6 +2101,7 @@ static int sof_get_control_data(struct snd_soc_component *scomp,
size_t *size)
{
const struct snd_kcontrol_new *kc;
+ struct sof_ipc_ctrl_data *cdata;
struct soc_mixer_control *sm;
struct soc_bytes_ext *sbe;
struct soc_enum *se;
@@ -2136,16 +2138,25 @@ static int sof_get_control_data(struct snd_soc_component *scomp,
return -EINVAL;
}
- wdata[i].pdata = wdata[i].control->control_data->data;
- if (!wdata[i].pdata)
- return -EINVAL;
+ cdata = wdata[i].control->control_data;
+ if (widget->dobj.widget.kcontrol_type[i] == SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES) {
+ if (cdata->data->magic != SOF_ABI_MAGIC)
+ return -EINVAL;
- /* make sure data is valid - data can be updated at runtime */
- if (widget->dobj.widget.kcontrol_type[i] == SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES &&
- wdata[i].pdata->magic != SOF_ABI_MAGIC)
- return -EINVAL;
+ wdata[i].pdata = cdata->data->data;
+ wdata[i].pdata_size = cdata->data->size;
+ } else {
+ /* points to the control data union */
+ wdata[i].pdata = cdata->chanv;
+ /*
+ * wdata[i].control->size is calculated with struct_size
+ * and includes the size of struct sof_ipc_ctrl_data
+ */
+ wdata[i].pdata_size = wdata[i].control->size -
+ sizeof(struct sof_ipc_ctrl_data);
+ }
- *size += wdata[i].pdata->size;
+ *size += wdata[i].pdata_size;
/* get data type */
switch (wdata[i].control->cmd) {
@@ -2236,10 +2247,12 @@ static int sof_process_load(struct snd_soc_component *scomp, int index,
*/
if (ipc_data_size) {
for (i = 0; i < widget->num_kcontrols; i++) {
- memcpy(&process->data + offset,
- wdata[i].pdata->data,
- wdata[i].pdata->size);
- offset += wdata[i].pdata->size;
+ if (!wdata[i].pdata_size)
+ continue;
+
+ memcpy(&process->data[offset], wdata[i].pdata,
+ wdata[i].pdata_size);
+ offset += wdata[i].pdata_size;
}
}
--
2.31.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 12:40 [PATCH v3] ASoC: SOF: ipc3-topology: Correct get_control_data for non bytes payload Peter Ujfalusi
2022-04-27 13:08 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2022-04-27 13:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-04-27 13:26 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-04-27 13:13 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-04-27 13:20 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-04-27 18:47 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2022-04-28 2:19 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YmlAOm7AlZGpQLPS@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cujomalainey@google.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox