From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1FAAC433EF for ; Tue, 31 May 2022 10:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37D9D1B0D; Tue, 31 May 2022 12:41:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 37D9D1B0D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1653993753; bh=s7sxLOqgfijeQjrpsUPoXPAzLEgMW5MCPisLNca/hBY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=HbUdhYVrEHhKyuUzLnR7ksH8xcaiXyLbnwSQHdJATa4BySgUyI71ByZFdO+tQRQX7 MD/UZAD6R8FD/GP+HzsT3xRURHpt+zymtLz6pGqK+LfHrV4L0oizae2ewr9QPhd44Y 5gR9M7x9RJeUz69NrPlABvWUKHyLRqlNcWlc6OAo= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA806F8012E; Tue, 31 May 2022 12:41:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 11FFEF80161; Tue, 31 May 2022 12:41:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30C73F800DE for ; Tue, 31 May 2022 12:41:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 30C73F800DE Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hEtt+/8x" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D238B810E8; Tue, 31 May 2022 10:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B736FC385A9; Tue, 31 May 2022 10:41:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1653993694; bh=s7sxLOqgfijeQjrpsUPoXPAzLEgMW5MCPisLNca/hBY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hEtt+/8x2Z5c9MhvGc3XhsOSvwcO+gunXGfGBxIxfh4mLr31EDTU/xuOX0wswBfXn PtqdLcRqPBqsQzGG++FUYyILK9Gbs+KUFr0lY4GLIyhn6hqRkW4DMlgacHa53/MurS eSivjJoymwuRnuxsHwpUvwYfK3lXeCCo3aq0VXFxDd2GITUmbyb5cgyW0nkwfDCyFj vX/d3iBbifZLAvwAyt5kTNlX1gww0pnHDdgl26i+5dJl0AMXeOZMcRDVvSYokTFVqR 7lXXrys9Q9GOANb7rLSjvyI0l9tSsuid1HGWgTdMwpVfT3E0gMZKP/C8RLcNcNMWkL VBVsIOpTw2twA== Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 12:41:31 +0200 From: Mark Brown To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: avs: Fix build error on arc, m68k and sparc Message-ID: References: <70daa951-4f77-3336-0567-e72e9e5e36c6@intel.com> <20220529141250.1979827-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20220530201946.4pqljnpcts6ms557@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y+/ySbFgvwPqmn02" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220530201946.4pqljnpcts6ms557@pengutronix.de> X-Cookie: May your camel be as swift as the wind. Cc: pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, Cezary Rojewski , upstream@semihalf.com, rad@semihalf.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.com, hdegoede@redhat.com, lma@semihalf.com, amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com, cujomalainey@chromium.org, Guenter Roeck X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --y+/ySbFgvwPqmn02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 10:19:46PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 03:29:48PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > > Please don't send new patches in reply to old patches or serieses, this > > makes it harder for both people and tools to understand what is going > > on - it can bury things in mailboxes and make it difficult to keep track > > of what current patches are, both for the new patches and the old ones. > The motivation to do that is that the thread for a patch that broke > something is the canonical place to look if someone already reported (or > even fixed) the problem before. Once something is applied and as time marches on that starts to get less and less helpful, searches for Fixes: are probably better there. > That b4 seems to fail to extract the patch is indeed unfortunate. For a > MUA I'd expect that it sorts threads after the last received mail, so > that part is only a matter of a sane mail reader configuration. The sorting really is a user workflow/preference thing - for example I find it helpful to sort by age of the thread to highlight new patches which might be simple to deal with before older threads with complicated discussions in them. --y+/ySbFgvwPqmn02 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmKV8NoACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Co6wf+LKg+NS4kUXHr4/9uofoLaLUo5uJeD3MFSr/HgEka/FwnliFXfPVwOj6j uz90Vlu0ecvmzsXcYXcSyW41yJv/ZVG/GUH66FDch18hazPcK9aAspZo+nX42f3r BhnEE8rYiORboRnJ5wn7VFNx9++gmzIlG+ZK/iLaNNrwu2wfFyR4CQ+O4EH40uQ7 PFhWZQgJF12ysihx12Ug+QbXFI+02phpFHliVJQwwUPqMY68lCbMdT1wZTctZKY6 BpgX3JrvfJ/v+5oimvBA0gae2XP+OqWBVNtKFyAPKs7WWL+QsKt0BxXNn5B/QPss lHGKu0ZxvM1POJhJFqDGe21pya2fDQ== =ne78 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y+/ySbFgvwPqmn02--