From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
To: Mark Hills <mark@xwax.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Regression in Final Scratch 'ScratchAmp' quirk (DJ interface)
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:53:40 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZXzhKbCEK04caa2@geday> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05f7b47d-1762-c6aa-ddb1-3c6f6128cf44@xwax.org>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 03:54:29PM +0000, Mark Hills wrote:
> The ScratchAmp worked perfectly with a quirk, but now that seems to have
> regressed and the device is no longer detected [1].
>
> It's design is from 2002, based on class-compliant (Philips UDA1325H)
> chips. It hides itself behind a 'vendor specific' description, presumably
> as it was launched in a closed system with specific hardware and software
> for DJ'ing.
Hi Mark, great fan of your work with xwax here.
Perhaps adding USB_DEVICE_VENDOR_SPEC(0x103d, 0x0100) and
USB_DEVICE_VENDOR_SPEC(0x103d, 0x0101) to quirks-table.h can do the
trick?
Regards,
Geraldo Nascimento
>
> So this quirk was introduced in 2007:
>
> +/* Stanton/N2IT Final Scratch v1 device ('Scratchamp') */
> +{
> + USB_DEVICE(0x103d, 0x0100),
> + .driver_info = (unsigned long) & (const struct snd_usb_audio_quirk) {
> + .vendor_name = "Stanton",
> + .product_name = "ScratchAmp",
> + .ifnum = QUIRK_NO_INTERFACE
> + }
> +},
> +{
> + USB_DEVICE(0x103d, 0x0101),
> + .driver_info = (unsigned long) & (const struct snd_usb_audio_quirk) {
> + .vendor_name = "Stanton",
> + .product_name = "ScratchAmp",
> + .ifnum = QUIRK_NO_INTERFACE
> + }
> +},
>
> In a modern kernel, the (ineffective) quirk is now in sound/usb/card.c:
>
> + /* Stanton/N2IT Final Scratch v1 device ('Scratchamp') */
> + DEVICE_NAME(0x103d, 0x0100, "Stanton", "ScratchAmp"),
> + DEVICE_NAME(0x103d, 0x0101, "Stanton", "ScratchAmp"),
>
> Is there a functional difference between these quirks and/or any reason
> the device would no longer be detected?
>
> I noted the commits went via use of QUIRK_RENAME_DEVICE(), perhaps
> misleading the refactoring to assume the quirk was purely a rename.
>
> Below is an "lsusb" of the device, dated from 2008; I don't currently have
> access to my own device, or know exactly when this regressed.
>
> Many thanks
>
> [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/xwax/mailman/message/48496984/
> [2] http://www.pogo.org.uk/~mark/linuxdj/scratchamp.html
> [3] https://finalscratch.sourceforge.net/innards/
>
> --
> Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-03 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-03 15:54 Regression in Final Scratch 'ScratchAmp' quirk (DJ interface) Mark Hills
2024-01-03 23:53 ` Geraldo Nascimento [this message]
2024-01-04 9:42 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZXzhKbCEK04caa2@geday \
--to=geraldogabriel@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=mark@xwax.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox