From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75CFCCD11C2 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 10:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90DA62D1A; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:08:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 90DA62D1A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1712311725; bh=P9W+ZZQct7WCcuVA2dzO5wfwCSITBeI48v1sQMxHgoA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Archive:List-Help:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=vny/mmfBQ/2Orku9jj/JttlPIzCxUCZ8IE+u6v/AUFKFv74BP5YbixNGWyKiMwEas Q31tC/O14j2S2WyfyhY22IAkJD+O0fqG3kkPVOIPlDHxtoirIW0pwtifxSnHGcb3sh ZIU4SrpYidSha+pPegYQOhHb7Z99efkJqYUlXLSk= Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 69FCAF80587; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:08:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailman-core.alsa-project.org (mailman-core.alsa-project.org [10.254.200.10]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74F6F805A9; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:08:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 6B9F3F8020D; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:08:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C47D3F80007 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:07:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz C47D3F80007 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gmx.de header.i=oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=s31663417 header.b=kLsG4/FX DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1712311678; x=1712916478; i=oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de; bh=P9W+ZZQct7WCcuVA2dzO5wfwCSITBeI48v1sQMxHgoA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References: In-Reply-To; b=kLsG4/FX3M0M0VCDlCjbdKRPzPktBTOyYUItif93IzTR4XL97HievtTOx7EPaHFu NcJTCypTXx9J14OgORh8E96HTxBPVH6oXnsFRzzATx6hP6Jyzjh/qQ4WM/7iGsjZO +bbkigEG7iMbx+hGxdI223ulZYJid114dJxSdpCyYC5yAWQDYeMz0eIiAXltrvsS3 exZx+qlIxnszqsCzvPLE8G+V0R+jZ3m+G5EDiePoI+cC6QS43IT7jIqMLv5AG0Wmi b1FO+7pXUEkvMF/Anyhcl+jGOcow4Y/tE+q5CFIdiDdecpRvmscrxy0l9J59XZRpl C4BaUTSi1gaS1iC+Cw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from ugly.fritz.box ([89.247.162.116]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MPokD-1sDo6P0NSl-00MqQh; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 12:07:58 +0200 Received: by ugly.fritz.box (masqmail 0.3.6-dev, from userid 1000) id 1rsgUH-t9o-00; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 12:07:57 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:07:57 +0200 From: Oswald Buddenhagen To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] ALSA: emu10k1 & emux: fixes related to wavetable playback Message-ID: References: <20240404100048.819674-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> <875xwwnp27.wl-tiwai@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <875xwwnp27.wl-tiwai@suse.de> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ql/2x59VrlaECHEz+pLdQ/7FSO3yVXngCcR1WaxURDjZD9kxTwL wbyGS1xRPi7r+UREmqY1uU6Nfp/vPkYfzcfnfm6XWMBT1GizzVnAxQnM/1p4znbV6ccSIvK n11mq4DNDUNI7RNrUoOol5yNB2cAgrqShUAiQRtu7gQf4sCKpT/j0C68FsaA8r5gVNxURN3 XTgLA1A37vGqJYrUYHJsw== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:Pj3aAlUMCqM=;9d4dbEte07GzDDW3buXp/SrM964 trUE/g2TJGnfL/E8wHMTL8IGhsyKtXG/DpZC6tcfCF0y0NrgndxXezJ2FQjn9zofI8kF9nLot XaKkj/JfvewbrpAosoXmFvoMeaaLFHGZiIZOT6V6zfCR5cXk45Sij6zqRDoh1vPWEERhw0AZV B+0lHXbmVoxBWYkHVh03KPTLrAIPohKEbRUBmeNSZIdmoiJPm/BFrx2GTEMNaJQHvykd6jQLv JOCGGcxMwwq1CUlfSxD6bTKZuXH/j4pdNRw0Bd5HEhzSnaVbuPIYbDUGPFGeqRgJ14vKMjOxW 6nb+DXIPcBX9ReEjL3dZbajIGbBtmVeA3aB2Vvd+djrH+9ct2k/lFHFiqqdDEhZ9l2jpAF8He IBOuXofRvRqAx4R1Du64xm9Iq/lh3316g7mr5il/LWkrcFYP895DD+06UHn0AHWvWlAkSdLMV KRVVG86lUO/MwGGDebklSjTR7eg8zxrznSIhLuIo/zd9gsNwV2iL6fb7WbrOFGb1BIvHeM9En v4eD/4fphnEUkKY3I2I3oxZst+S5TFNc4Umt1mijd36sQesb2mY/+ZB3sF/JTUNQDPfFtLVb/ I2Y3AE//+ZTtUuTCHafcA34ROv2INSpGwjwQoDYmvEmWJynOxmA0eimOZPe4EEeZDskR2kTUD HiX15vyqKTv+z0ZbYBpCThwVaUNTzIfqrwesyYwAUoa7ch3T+Qk+I8OfZOlRJxnkz1BmS2PGJ 5BozhPb6MnPLZki46/LHrePAWzraQLPnrr4WysDSF0peRhWDsgCSIMvqo3P1KXI/H0GdJVkd9 8E8wKYPO9jzchSsulTVZp+10MUB4yCeac+QLV3NuBB6cY= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID-Hash: 47I6GWBKO5IVQLMBMIHMGYTGLX3Y7ZOK X-Message-ID-Hash: 47I6GWBKO5IVQLMBMIHMGYTGLX3Y7ZOK X-MailFrom: oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-alsa-devel.alsa-project.org-0; header-match-alsa-devel.alsa-project.org-1; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 11:20:32AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: >On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:00:31 +0200, >Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> >> --- >> This patch series needs to be applied on top of the patch titled >> "Revert "ALSA: emu10k1: fix synthesizer sample playback position and >> caching"". > >The patch set isn't cleanly applicable even after the revert patch. >The patch 7 fails. > >Please rebase to the latest for-linus branch and resubmit. > this makes no sense; i'm getting a bit-identical patch after the rebase (which is unsurprising, as the file in question wasn't touched in years). are you sure you didn't corrupt the patch somehow (it happened before, cf. summary of c960b012ec47)? or maybe you have an unpublished conflicting commit? if there is an actual problem and you just named the wrong patch, then i suspect that it's just git-am being stupid - the rebases from 6.8 and later from your master from about a week ago went through smoothly.