Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,  broonie@kernel.org
Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com, tiwai@suse.com, amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/17] ASoC: Intel: bdw_rt286: Refactor suspend/resume
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:25:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a32db639-89e7-de35-6943-b29a7fb52200@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391e54d-7b6f-7b43-d979-ce08febd2378@intel.com>


> Jacks are often initialized during dai_link initialization which is
> completely out of platform_device area. This report made me think
> further - if we assign jack in dai_link->init(), we should be able to
> drop it in dai_link->exit().
> 
> Not exactly! ->init() is done once card components are already accounted
> for (available for use) but snd_soc_link_exit() is called during
> snd_soc_remove_pcm_runtime() when card components are available no
> longer - soc_remove_link_components().
> 
> TLDR: teardown path is not symmetric with its counterpart, perhaps a
> problem yet to be addressed. I'll see if moving the jack-NULLing to
> codec's DAI ->remove() won't be a better temporary (?) solution than
> reverting to platform_device->remove() usage.

It's a problem that impacted other platforms, see e.g.

static void kabylake_rt5660_codec_exit(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
{
	struct kbl_codec_private *ctx = snd_soc_card_get_drvdata(rtd->card);

	/*
	 * The .exit() can be reached without going through the .init()
	 * so explicitly test if the gpiod is valid
	 */
	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ctx->gpio_lo_mute))
		gpiod_put(ctx->gpio_lo_mute);
}

I vaguely recall hitting this myself when working with codec properties.
It's worthy of a comment in the ASoC header to make sure this is better
known/shared.

I see in other drivers that the use of component_set_jack() is
symmetrical between .init and .exit, so far we haven't seen any issues
with sof_rt5682.c and others.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-13  9:15 [PATCH v2 00/17] ASoC: Intel: haswell and broadwell boards update Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] ASoC: Intel: Rename haswell source file to hsw_rt5640 Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] ASoC: Intel: hsw_rt5640: Reword prefixes of all driver members Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] ASoC: Intel: hsw_rt5640: Reword driver name Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] ASoC: Intel: hsw_rt5640: Update code indentation Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] ASoC: Intel: hsw_rt5640: Update file comments Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] ASoC: Intel: hsw_rt5640: Improve probe() function quality Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] ASoC: Intel: hsw_rt5640: Improve hw_params() debug-ability Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] ASoC: Intel: Rename broadwell source file to bdw_rt286 Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] ASoC: Intel: bdw_rt286: Reword prefixes of all driver members Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] ASoC: Intel: bdw_rt286: Reword driver name Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] ASoC: Intel: bdw_rt286: Update code indentation Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] ASoC: Intel: bdw_rt286: Update file comments Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] ASoC: Intel: bdw_rt286: Improve probe() function quality Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] ASoC: Intel: bdw_rt286: Improve hw_params() debug-ability Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] ASoC: Intel: bdw_rt286: Improve codec_link_init() quality Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] ASoC: Intel: bdw_rt286: Refactor suspend/resume Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-15  1:27   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-06-15 12:57     ` Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-15 16:25       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2022-06-19 13:04         ` Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-19 13:58       ` Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] ASoC: Intel: bdw_rt286: Remove FE DAI ops Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-24 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 00/17] ASoC: Intel: haswell and broadwell boards update Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a32db639-89e7-de35-6943-b29a7fb52200@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox