From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: dmaengine <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ASoC: Intel: rename SND_SST_MFLD_PLATFORM to SND_SST_MID_PLATFORM
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 08:18:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5c5956c-3bd8-4a28-a456-babc5fd06846@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170103033815.GA3573@localhost>
>> On 01/02/2017 09:20 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> Rename SND_SST_MFLD_PLATFORM to SND_SST_MID_PLATFORM to make it clear that is
>>> not only about Medfield platform.
>> Does this change make sense? Medfield was a completely different
>> platform and lumping everything under the same Kconfig option
>> doesn't seem right to me... Plus we've stopped using 'mid' for
>> years, no one would know what it stands for. The only clear
>> architecture feature is the presence of the switch matrix that
>> uniquely identifies all platforms based on Baytrail, Cherrytrail,
>> Merrifield and Anniedale. Medfield/Clovertrail did not expose a
>> switch matrix.
> Mea culpa..
>
> So we started this with medfield and the driver construction is pretty much
> the same untill skylake. So clubbing under mfld bucket made sense to me.
>
> MID is not flavour of the season now.
>
> If anyone comes with a better name, am for that :)
SND_SST_HIFI2_MOBILE_PLATFORM ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-03 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-02 15:20 [PATCH v3 0/4] ASoC: Intel: clean up Kconfig Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-02 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] ASoC: Intel: select DW_DMAC_CORE since it's mandatory Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-03 2:00 ` Keyon Jie
2017-01-02 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ASoC: Intel: remove redundant select SND_SOC_INTEL_SST Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-17 18:45 ` Applied "ASoC: Intel: remove redundant select SND_SOC_INTEL_SST" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2017-01-02 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ASoC: Intel: remove ignored dependencies Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-17 18:45 ` Applied "ASoC: Intel: remove ignored dependencies" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2017-01-02 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ASoC: Intel: rename SND_SST_MFLD_PLATFORM to SND_SST_MID_PLATFORM Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-02 16:05 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2017-01-03 3:38 ` Vinod Koul
2017-01-03 14:18 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2017-01-04 10:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-04 16:58 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2017-01-05 3:53 ` Vinod Koul
2017-01-05 8:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b5c5956c-3bd8-4a28-a456-babc5fd06846@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=yang.jie@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).