alsa-devel.alsa-project.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "j t" <mark473@gmail.com>
To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: Will the real alsa wiki please stand up?
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 12:16:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b88f52540705260416n412f59c4md6d402c960d95c76@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4658013E.9000408@ingomueller.net>

On 5/26/07, Ingo Müller <alsa@ingomueller.net> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If you had read carefully what the main page of alsa.opensrc.org sais,
> you'd know that this is an unofficial wiki.

Oops - my bad. Sorry...

> The story of the other wiki
> is bit harder to find, but if you want, you can read it at
>
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2007-April/000412.html
>
> The basic of the story is, that it has been created maybe two months ago
> by official ALSA developpers to replace the official ALSA web site,
> which was difficult to maintain and to keep up to date. The thing is,
> that only a few people seem to care that much that they would help to
> transfer content from the web site to the new wiki (thanks a lot to
> those who do care!). Feel free to contribute :-)

I will, just as soon as I work out which of the two wikis I should be
contributing to...

>
> Anyway, I totally agree with you that having one single wiki would be a
> lot better for everybody. Again, the problem is, that the merging has to
> be done by someone and this means work.

I could be wrong (that's my normal disclaimer out of the way), but
surely the effort of merging would seem to be futile if the majority
of edits subsequently go to the "wrong" wiki (I'm talking here from a
practical viewpoint).

Does anyone know if the people who maintain the "unofficial" wiki
would be offended/"put up resistance"/disagree if their wiki were
"superceded"? If no, a note could be added to the unofficial about the
new "official" one (it's interesting to note that the unofficial wiki
doesn't mention the official one at all, although that could just be a
lack of resources, rather than something intentional).

I hope that at least some of this makes sense...

Jaime

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-26 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-26  9:00 Will the real alsa wiki please stand up? j t
2007-05-26  9:43 ` Ingo Müller
2007-05-26 11:16   ` j t [this message]
2007-05-27 21:10     ` Ingo Müller
2007-05-30 19:29       ` j t
2007-05-30 22:16         ` Lee Revell
2007-05-31 10:17         ` Takashi Iwai
2007-05-28  8:53 ` Jaroslav Kysela
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-26 21:40 Eliot Blennerhassett
2007-07-27  9:40 ` Takashi Iwai
2007-07-31  9:54   ` Eliot Blennerhassett
2007-08-02 12:50     ` Takashi Iwai
2007-08-02 18:15       ` Ingo Müller
2007-08-02 22:37       ` Eliot Blennerhassett
2007-08-03  7:19         ` Ingo Müller
2007-08-03  9:22           ` Jaroslav Kysela

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b88f52540705260416n412f59c4md6d402c960d95c76@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mark473@gmail.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).