From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: "Amadeusz Sławiński" <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: tiwai@suse.de, Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
broonie@kernel.org, Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ALSA: hda: intel-nhlt: add intel_nhlt_ssp_mclk_mask()
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 10:52:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7bd2799-3cbf-a984-8f48-5e069b88db51@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b112f824-631d-40d4-31bd-9bd56f31930e@linux.intel.com>
Hi Amadeusz,
>> +int intel_nhlt_ssp_mclk_mask(struct nhlt_acpi_table *nhlt, int ssp_num)
>> +{
>> + struct nhlt_endpoint *epnt;
>> + struct nhlt_fmt *fmt;
>> + struct nhlt_fmt_cfg *cfg;
>> + int mclk_mask = 0;
>> + int i, j;
>> +
>> + if (!nhlt)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + epnt = (struct nhlt_endpoint *)nhlt->desc;
>> + for (i = 0; i < nhlt->endpoint_count; i++) {
>> +
>> + /* we only care about endpoints connected to an audio codec
>> over SSP */
>> + if (epnt->linktype == NHLT_LINK_SSP &&
>> + epnt->device_type == NHLT_DEVICE_I2S &&
>> + epnt->virtual_bus_id == ssp_num) {
>
> if (epnt->linktype != NHLT_LINK_SSP ||
> epnt->device_type != NHLT_DEVICE_I2S ||
> epnt->virtual_bus_id != ssp_num)
> continue;
>
> and then you can remove one indentation level below?
Would that work? We still need to move the epnt pointer:
epnt = (struct nhlt_endpoint *)((u8 *)epnt + epnt->length);
and moving this in the endpoint_count loop would be ugly as well.
>> +
>> + fmt = (struct nhlt_fmt *)(epnt->config.caps +
>> epnt->config.size);
>> + cfg = fmt->fmt_config;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * In theory all formats should use the same MCLK but it
>> doesn't hurt to
>> + * double-check that the configuration is consistent
>> + */
>> + for (j = 0; j < fmt->fmt_count; j++) {
>> + u32 *blob;
>> + int mdivc_offset;
>> +
>> + if (cfg->config.size >= SSP_BLOB_V1_0_SIZE) {
>> + blob = (u32 *)cfg->config.caps;
>> +
>> + if (blob[1] == SSP_BLOB_VER_2_0)
>> + mdivc_offset = SSP_BLOB_V2_0_MDIVC_OFFSET;
>> + else if (blob[1] == SSP_BLOB_VER_1_5)
>> + mdivc_offset = SSP_BLOB_V1_5_MDIVC_OFFSET;
>> + else
>> + mdivc_offset = SSP_BLOB_V1_0_MDIVC_OFFSET;
>> +
>> + mclk_mask |= blob[mdivc_offset] & GENMASK(1, 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> + cfg = (struct nhlt_fmt_cfg *)(cfg->config.caps +
>> cfg->config.size);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + epnt = (struct nhlt_endpoint *)((u8 *)epnt + epnt->length);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return mclk_mask;
>
> Although I understand that it is relegated to the caller, but if both
> mclk being set is considered an error maybe add some kind of check here
> instead and free callers from having to remember about it?
>
> if (hweight_long(mclk_mask) != 1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> return mclk_mask;
I went back and forth multiple times on this one. I can't figure out if
this would be a bug or a feature, it could be e.g. a test capability and
it's supported in hardware. I decided to make the decision in the caller
rather than a lower level in the library.
If the tools used to generate NHLT don't support this multi-MCLK mode
then we could indeed move the test here.
>
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(intel_nhlt_ssp_mclk_mask);
>> +
>> static struct nhlt_specific_cfg *
>> nhlt_get_specific_cfg(struct device *dev, struct nhlt_fmt *fmt, u8
>> num_ch,
>> u32 rate, u8 vbps, u8 bps)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-23 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-22 18:59 [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: SOF: Intel: override mclk_id for ES8336 support Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-08-22 18:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: SOF: add quirk to override topology mclk_id Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-08-22 18:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] ALSA: hda: intel-nhlt: add intel_nhlt_ssp_mclk_mask() Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-08-23 8:32 ` Takashi Iwai
2022-08-23 8:41 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-08-23 8:33 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-08-23 8:52 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2022-08-23 14:55 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-08-23 15:18 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-08-24 10:53 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-08-24 11:17 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-08-22 18:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: override mclk_id after parsing NHLT SSP blob Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-08-22 18:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: refine SSP count support Pierre-Louis Bossart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7bd2799-3cbf-a984-8f48-5e069b88db51@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox