* [PATCH v4 1/2] ASoC: tlv320dac33: Remove deprecated create_singlethread_workqueue
2016-09-04 15:56 [PATCH v4 0/2] ASoc Remove deprecated create_singlethread_workqueue Bhaktipriya Shridhar
@ 2016-09-04 15:57 ` Bhaktipriya Shridhar
2016-09-04 15:58 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ASoC: Intel: " Bhaktipriya Shridhar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bhaktipriya Shridhar @ 2016-09-04 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai
Cc: Tejun Heo, alsa-devel, linux-kernel
The workqueue "dac33_wq" queues a single work item &dac33->work and
hence doesn't require ordering. Also, it is not being used on a memory
reclaim path. Hence, it has been converted to use system_wq.
System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
for a long time now and hence it's not required to have a singlethreaded
workqueue just to gain concurrency. Unlike a dedicated per-cpu workqueue
created with create_singlethread_workqueue(), system_wq allows multiple
work items to overlap executions even on the same CPU; however, a
per-cpu workqueue doesn't have any CPU locality or global ordering
guarantee unless the target CPU is explicitly specified and thus the
increase of local concurrency shouldn't make any difference.
The work item has been flushed in dac33_soc_remove to ensure that
there are no pending tasks while disconnecting the driver.
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v4:
-No change. Split the patch into a patch set.
sound/soc/codecs/tlv320dac33.c | 17 ++++-------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320dac33.c b/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320dac33.c
index f7a6ce7..6822ac1 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320dac33.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320dac33.c
@@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ static const char *dac33_supply_names[DAC33_NUM_SUPPLIES] = {
struct tlv320dac33_priv {
struct mutex mutex;
- struct workqueue_struct *dac33_wq;
struct work_struct work;
struct snd_soc_codec *codec;
struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[DAC33_NUM_SUPPLIES];
@@ -771,7 +770,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dac33_interrupt_handler(int irq, void *dev)
/* Do not schedule the workqueue in Mode7 */
if (dac33->fifo_mode != DAC33_FIFO_MODE7)
- queue_work(dac33->dac33_wq, &dac33->work);
+ schedule_work(&dac33->work);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -1127,7 +1126,7 @@ static int dac33_pcm_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd,
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE:
if (dac33->fifo_mode) {
dac33->state = DAC33_PREFILL;
- queue_work(dac33->dac33_wq, &dac33->work);
+ schedule_work(&dac33->work);
}
break;
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP:
@@ -1135,7 +1134,7 @@ static int dac33_pcm_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd,
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH:
if (dac33->fifo_mode) {
dac33->state = DAC33_FLUSH;
- queue_work(dac33->dac33_wq, &dac33->work);
+ schedule_work(&dac33->work);
}
break;
default:
@@ -1410,14 +1409,6 @@ static int dac33_soc_probe(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
dac33->irq = -1;
}
if (dac33->irq != -1) {
- /* Setup work queue */
- dac33->dac33_wq =
- create_singlethread_workqueue("tlv320dac33");
- if (dac33->dac33_wq == NULL) {
- free_irq(dac33->irq, codec);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
-
INIT_WORK(&dac33->work, dac33_work);
}
}
@@ -1437,7 +1428,7 @@ static int dac33_soc_remove(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
if (dac33->irq >= 0) {
free_irq(dac33->irq, dac33->codec);
- destroy_workqueue(dac33->dac33_wq);
+ flush_work(&dac33->work);
}
return 0;
}
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 2/2] ASoC: Intel: Remove deprecated create_singlethread_workqueue
2016-09-04 15:56 [PATCH v4 0/2] ASoc Remove deprecated create_singlethread_workqueue Bhaktipriya Shridhar
2016-09-04 15:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ASoC: tlv320dac33: " Bhaktipriya Shridhar
@ 2016-09-04 15:58 ` Bhaktipriya Shridhar
2016-09-04 16:37 ` kbuild test robot
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bhaktipriya Shridhar @ 2016-09-04 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai
Cc: Tejun Heo, alsa-devel, linux-kernel
The workqueue "post_msg_wq" queues a single work item
&drv->ipc_post_msg_wq and hence doesn't require ordering. Also, it is
not being used on a memory reclaim path. Hence, it has been converted to
use system_wq.
System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
for a long time now and hence it's not required to have a singlethreaded
workqueue just to gain concurrency. Unlike a dedicated per-cpu workqueue
created with create_singlethread_workqueue(), system_wq allows multiple
work items to overlap executions even on the same CPU; however, a
per-cpu workqueue doesn't have any CPU locality or global ordering
guarantee unless the target CPU is explicitly specified and thus the
increase of local concurrency shouldn't make any difference.
The work item has been flushed in sst_context_cleanup to ensure that
there are no pending tasks while disconnecting the driver.
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v4:
-No change content-wise. Split the patch into a patch set.
sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c | 15 +++++----------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
index a4b458e..64d6dee 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static irqreturn_t intel_sst_interrupt_mrfld(int irq, void *context)
spin_unlock(&drv->ipc_spin_lock);
/* we can send more messages to DSP so trigger work */
- queue_work(drv->post_msg_wq, &drv->ipc_post_msg_wq);
+ schedule_work(&drv->ipc_post_msg_wq);
retval = IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -212,10 +212,6 @@ static int sst_workqueue_init(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx)
INIT_WORK(&ctx->ipc_post_msg_wq, sst_process_pending_msg);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->wait_queue);
- ctx->post_msg_wq =
- create_singlethread_workqueue("sst_post_msg_wq");
- if (!ctx->post_msg_wq)
- return -EBUSY;
return 0;
}
@@ -318,7 +314,6 @@ int sst_context_init(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx)
return 0;
do_free_mem:
- destroy_workqueue(ctx->post_msg_wq);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sst_context_init);
@@ -330,7 +325,7 @@ void sst_context_cleanup(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx)
sst_unregister(ctx->dev);
sst_set_fw_state_locked(ctx, SST_SHUTDOWN);
flush_scheduled_work();
- destroy_workqueue(ctx->post_msg_wq);
+ flush_work(&ctx->ipc_post_msg_wq);
pm_qos_remove_request(ctx->qos);
kfree(ctx->fw_sg_list.src);
kfree(ctx->fw_sg_list.dst);
@@ -414,7 +409,7 @@ static int intel_sst_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
sst_set_fw_state_locked(ctx, SST_RESET);
synchronize_irq(ctx->irq_num);
- flush_workqueue(ctx->post_msg_wq);
+ flush_work(&ctx->ipc_post_msg_wq);
ctx->ops->reset(ctx);
/* save the shim registers because PMC doesn't save state */
@@ -445,8 +440,8 @@ static int intel_sst_suspend(struct device *dev)
return -EBUSY;
}
}
- synchronize_irq(ctx->irq_num);
- flush_workqueue(ctx->post_msg_wq);
+ synchronize_irq(ctx->irq_num);
+ flush_work(ctx->ipc_post_msg_wq);
/* Move the SST state to Reset */
sst_set_fw_state_locked(ctx, SST_RESET);
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread