From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:32:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <6da7e6dc-b181-d26c-9f09-6592469193be@users.sourceforge.net> <99282c06-bfad-d7cf-16d8-eb1e015ebdbd@users.sourceforge.net> <19724fa4-47eb-827c-cb17-126440500179@users.sourceforge.net> <727d5044-bad0-5170-83c0-dfddcc919588@users.sourceforge.net> <68fd71f5-a3e5-dbb7-d0d9-f9844fabe6c8@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.14]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B8E266B02 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:32:32 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: Arvind Yadav , Takashi Sakamoto , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org > So, that's all. Think how the things can be improved in your side, I know a few possibilities here. > not blaming others. But I know also a few other approaches where higher level development tools help to improve the patch review process in significant ways for trusted system environments. Regards, Markus