Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: "Amadeusz Sławiński" <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>,
	"Peter Ujfalusi" <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, tiwai@suse.de,
	perex@perex.cz
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com,
	kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com, rander.wang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: introduce helpers for 'extended links' PM
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:24:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d826c3ac-4211-d4b7-38d4-059ccaea179c@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc5a4267-f050-c311-5d56-a2e7cfe7e747@linux.intel.com>




>> +static int check_power_active(u32 __iomem *lctl, int sublink, bool
>> enable)
> 
> Should last argument be named 'active' instead of 'enable'? It would
> make more sense to me.

Naming is the hardest part, eh?

I am not super happy with 'active', since the 'not-active' part is not
very clear: it's not suspended, it's really powered-off/disabled.

I also didn't want to introduce a power state, since again it's on or
off and we don't want to introduce the Dx concepts here.

If I had to revisit this, my preference would be:

static int check_sublink_power(u32 __iomem *lctl, int sublink, bool enabled)

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-28 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-27 11:29 [PATCH 00/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: HDaudio multi-link extension update Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 01/18] Documentation: sound: add description of Intel HDaudio multi-links Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 02/18] ALSA: hda: add HDaudio Extended link definitions Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 03/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: improve hda_bus_ml_free() helper Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 04/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add return value for hda_bus_ml_get_capabilities() Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 05/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: move to a dedicated module Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 06/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add structures to parse ALT links Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-30 15:51   ` Takashi Iwai
2023-03-30 16:09     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-03-30 18:07       ` Takashi Iwai
2023-03-31  3:05         ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 07/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: special-case HDaudio regular links Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 08/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: introduce helpers for 'extended links' PM Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-28 10:34   ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-03-28 13:24     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2023-03-30 11:42       ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-03-30 15:54   ` Takashi Iwai
2023-03-30 16:22     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 09/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add convenience helpers for SoundWire PM Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 10/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helper to return sublink count Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 11/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helpers to enable/check interrupts Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 12/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helpers to set link SYNC frequency Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 13/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helpers for sync_arm/sync_go Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 14/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helper to check cmdsync Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 15/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: program SoundWire LSDIID registers Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 16/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helpers to retrieve DMIC/SSP hlink Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 17/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helper to offload link ownership Peter Ujfalusi
2023-03-27 11:29 ` [PATCH 18/18] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: add helper to retrieve eml_lock Peter Ujfalusi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d826c3ac-4211-d4b7-38d4-059ccaea179c@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rander.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox