From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:40:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2cbef557-5f89-c630-e108-14ef2ce6b41a@users.sourceforge.net> <1547a4c2-5b70-e3a3-b482-d28c538e615c@users.sourceforge.net> <539adde3-a713-721f-2a0d-1d1ef925fb86@users.sourceforge.net> <9a9348f4-d059-de28-1445-0189b7fb0ba3@users.sourceforge.net> <3b7b24bd-4bdf-752e-1a62-cc71e9152acc@users.sourceforge.net> <6da7e6dc-b181-d26c-9f09-6592469193be@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.14]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A8E2677C6 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:40:23 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: Arvind Yadav , Takashi Sakamoto , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org > No-testing is the worst case. Free software development can occasionally mean that system tests can also be performed by a person who is different from the initial programmer. >> I am unsure if acceptable test results will ever be published for this >> software module. > > Then forget about your patches. I published some change possibilities. Now the chances are varying to receive constructive review comments for them as usual. >> * How do you think about to sort the remaining update candidates >> by their change size (or software age)? > > Irrelevant. Do you want that I point any other patch out which you could find easier to handle again? Regards, Markus