From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: sw parameter boundary Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:45:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <48620563.3050207@aimvalley.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.suse.de (ns.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63946243B8 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:45:46 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <48620563.3050207@aimvalley.nl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Norbert van Bolhuis Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:44:19 +0200, Norbert van Bolhuis wrote: > > > is the boundary sw parameter still used ? Yes. > where is it for ? It defines the wrap point to the position 0. > in the PCM kernel core (e.g. snd_pcm_playback_avail) it clearly serves > as a pointers wrap point, but which one ? It's for the absolute position handled internally. This isn't exported outside, so you don't care much about it, normally. > The one at the end of the DMA buffer or the one at the end of a process > (virtual) address range (4 GB) ? No. Takashi