From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [PATCH] 1616(M) cardbus improvements Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:21:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200711160007.00300.c.fertr@gmail.com> <200712030033.25351.c.fertr@gmail.com> <200712040043.25400.c.fertr@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.suse.de (ns.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2638424378 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:31:39 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <200712040043.25400.c.fertr@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Ctirad Fertr Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Tue, 4 Dec 2007 00:43:25 +0100, Ctirad Fertr wrote: > > Dne Monday 03 of December 2007 10:29:38 jste napsal(a): > > > In my patch, I modified the input put callback to use > > emu1616_src_regs. Check if it's a wrong implementation. > > Oh, you are right. I forgot to add 1616 related code here. Funny I didn't > noticed any problem in regular use, because I use just analog inputs for > capture (no difference between 1820 and 1616) and the internal routing worked > as expected :-) > Thanks for correcting. OK. Now applied to ALSA HG tree. Thanks! Takashi