From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ALSA: ac97: add codecs devicetree
	binding
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:45:46 +0200
Message-ID: <s5ha7rnditx.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
References: <20180621154356.5438-1-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
 <20180621154356.5438-2-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48C22676C4
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:45:47 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20180621154356.5438-2-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:43:56 +0200,
Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> 
> Add a devicetree binding for codecs. This is especially useful if the
> AC97 bitclk clock is provided by the codec, as it has to be described in
> the devicetree description for the ac97 bus code to aquire it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> ---
> Special review query: review the "return of_node_get(node)", which
> assumes that upon device removal, of_put_node(dev.of_node) will be
> called...

Is it really done automagically?  I couldn't spot it.


thanks,

Takashi