From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add snd_card_disconnect_sync()
	helper
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:10:04 +0200
Message-ID: <s5ha80px9z7.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
References: <20171011101618.8736-1-tiwai@suse.de>
 <87fuanv70u.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
 <s5hfuano5k0.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
 <87efq7v2qf.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
 <s5hh8v3pelc.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
 <87k1zvn8ci.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
 <s5hvajfxfx0.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
 <87k1zu7g1l.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
 <s5h7evuxdop.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
 <20171017200539.vjmxs2g3aat5zntx@sirena.co.uk>
 <87po9li5aa.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A806266FEA
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:10:04 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <87po9li5aa.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:08:44 +0200,
Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Takashi-san
> 
> > > It seems that the whole disconnect call can be dropped for the BE, as
> > > it does nothing practically for the register callback, either.
> > 
> > That feels like it's going to blow up on us at some point...  it's
> > probably right for most things though.
> 
> Wow !! Perfect !!
> 
> I tested your new "internal PCM" patch, and at least my kernel panic issue
> on DPCM was solved !
> 
> Tested-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>

OK, I'll keep the branch not merged to for-next yet for a while in
case we find any other breakage.  The plan is to merge these changes
for 4.15, so this will happen in a few days.

> # I din't know that "internal" option was for DPCM backend PCM...

That needs more documentation...


thanks,

Takashi