From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [Openvortex-dev] Re: Re: [ALSA - driver 0001138]: errors when installing au8820 modules Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:18:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200506071917.42953.alien999999999@users.sourceforge.net> <42A5DB84.2030407@mail.ru> <200506072002.49600.alien999999999@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200506072002.49600.alien999999999@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Alien Cc: Igor Kovalenko , openvortex-dev@nongnu.org, Raymond , alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:02:47 +0200, Alien wrote: > > this is a patch against some CVS version of a few weeks ago not more than 3 > weeks i think... The patch looks almost fine to me. Just subtle things: > @@ -202,6 +205,10 @@ > goto alloc_out; > } > > + snd_card_set_dev(card, &pci->dev); > + > + snd_card_set_dev(card, &pci->dev); > + > *rchip = chip; Too much :) > Index: alsa-kernel/pci/au88x0/au88x0_eqdata.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/alsa/alsa-kernel/pci/au88x0/au88x0_eqdata.c,v > retrieving revision 1.1 > diff -u -r1.1 au88x0_eqdata.c > --- alsa-kernel/pci/au88x0/au88x0_eqdata.c 9 Mar 2004 11:52:13 -0000 1.1 > +++ alsa-kernel/pci/au88x0/au88x0_eqdata.c 7 Jun 2005 17:56:37 -0000 > @@ -104,7 +104,11 @@ > }; > > /*_rodataba0:*/ > -static long eq_levels[32] = { > +static u16 eq_levels[64] = { > + 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, > + 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, > + 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, > + 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, > 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, > 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, > 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, You don't need to define values if the static array is initialize to zero. In this case, static u16 eq_levels[64]; would be better. Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track? If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy. Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20