Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: niraj kulkarni <kulkarniniraj14@gmail.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, david.henningsson@canonical.com
Subject: Re: Fw:  [Bug 1155202] [Intel DZ77SL-50K, Intel PantherPoint HDMI, Digital Out, HDMI] No sound at all
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:01:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hd2ivs5nm.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACWODjSKJ7yy6dvH3iCiHLvFgYokgmeSy06mYyGnX4N5JKtkEg@mail.gmail.com>

At Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:35:41 +0530,
niraj kulkarni wrote:
> 
> Removing these 3 usleep ranges is working now. Although I have a doubt for
> applying this patch on all chips. There have been a number of boards
> released after this particular board, but nobody else is facing this
> problem. Since spec does not specify a max on deasserting RST, some boards
> might actually take more than 100uS to reset. Will this patch work for
> those boards?
> 
> @@ -1149,7 +1149,7 @@
>         timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100);
>         while ((azx_readb(chip, GCTL) & ICH6_GCTL_RESET) &&
>                         time_before(jiffies, timeout))
> -               usleep_range(500, 1000);
> +               cpu_relax();
>  }
> 
>  /* exit link reset */
> @@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@
>         timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100);
>         while (!azx_readb(chip, GCTL) &&
>                         time_before(jiffies, timeout))
> -               usleep_range(500, 1000);
> +               cpu_relax();
>  }
> 
>  /* reset codec link */
> @@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@
>         /* delay for >= 100us for codec PLL to settle per spec
>          * Rev 0.9 section 5.5.1
>          */
> -       usleep_range(500, 1000);
> +       //usleep_range(500, 1000);

Why didn't you change as I suggested?  In my patch, I placed udelay(2)
since the spec tells so.  Didn't it interfere?

Replacing usleep_range() with cpu_relax() should make still working on
other boards because it doesn't change the length of the timeout
itself.  The timeout is set to very long (100ms).  The only drawback
would be a higher CPU usage at probing, but the impact should be
negligible.


Takashi

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-10  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <52ef1e8f.a4c3440a.53f1.fffff564SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2014-02-10  6:05 ` Fw: [Bug 1155202] [Intel DZ77SL-50K, Intel PantherPoint HDMI, Digital Out, HDMI] No sound at all niraj kulkarni
2014-02-10  9:01   ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2014-02-10 11:40     ` niraj kulkarni
2014-02-10 17:27       ` Takashi Iwai
2014-01-22 14:20 [alsa-devel] " Niraj Kulkarni
2014-01-24 13:11 ` Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=s5hd2ivs5nm.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
    --to=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=david.henningsson@canonical.com \
    --cc=kulkarniniraj14@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox