From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: emu10k1: Mark expected switch fall-throughs Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 18:44:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20180804201209.GA26701@embeddedor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3418926780C for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2018 18:44:05 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20180804201209.GA26701@embeddedor.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: " Gustavo A. R. Silva " Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Sat, 04 Aug 2018 22:12:09 +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comment with > a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting > to find. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Applied, thanks. Takashi