From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Start us224control via hotplug. was: Re: Tascam US-224 support
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:50:11 +0100
Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <s5hfzd6uisc.wl@alsa2.suse.de>
References: <20040216212352.GA566@tuba.home>
	<20040217214133.GC665@tuba.home>
	<s5h65e4wdxf.wl@alsa2.suse.de>
	<200402200040.33176.annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <200402200040.33176.annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=alsa-devel>
To: Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>
Cc: Martin Langer <martin-langer@gmx.de>, alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, David <david@robot-droid.com>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

At Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:40:32 +0100,
Karsten Wiese wrote:
> 
> this is a patch against /alsa-tools/usx2yloader/tascam_fpga.in:
> 
> >>>>>>
> Index: tascam_fpga.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/alsa/alsa-tools/usx2yloader/tascam_fpga.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 tascam_fpga.in
> --- tascam_fpga.in	19 Jan 2004 18:49:21 -0000	1.4
> +++ tascam_fpga.in	19 Feb 2004 22:16:04 -0000
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
>  1604/8001/*)
>  	CONTROLLER=@bindir@/us428control
>  	;;
> +1604/8005/*)
> +	CONTROLLER=@bindir@/us224control
> +	;;
>  *)
>  	;;
>  esac
> <<<<<<
> 
> unfortunately this patch is only half of what it should be:
> "us224control" is meant to be created from "ln -s us428control us224control"

is it necessary for performance except for the sane naming?
for example, in the case of aplay/arecord, both of them are the same
binary but perform differently according to the executed name.
if it's not the case, i'd like to keep the same name.

> how would we integrate this "ln -s us428control us224control" into Makefile.am 
> ? or should we just cp the symbolic link? but then: can you put the symbolic 
> link created by "ln -s us428control us224control" into CVS?
> 
> if nobody knows, here is what works out of the box:
> 
> >>>>>>
> Index: tascam_fpga.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/alsa/alsa-tools/usx2yloader/tascam_fpga.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 tascam_fpga.in
> --- tascam_fpga.in	19 Jan 2004 18:49:21 -0000	1.4
> +++ tascam_fpga.in	19 Feb 2004 22:16:04 -0000
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
>  1604/8001/*)
>  	CONTROLLER=@bindir@/us428control
>  	;;
> +1604/8005/*)
> +	CONTROLLER=@bindir@/us428control
> +	;;
>  *)
>  	;;
>  esac

that's fine.


Takashi


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click