From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EC0C433E1 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C54620758 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="lJJMAIoH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7C54620758 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05B35169A; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:44:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 05B35169A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1597657497; bh=wFSGuDIYSu8uuwax9SCVhjVQVPJVsw3YEbQKzTlWPJY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=lJJMAIoHJ1O28HPPJE70sutdEoNutGPGQgpfq8DMZxwDT19qt5kdcAGee32Ws51wW QvEMSASNXKARRsiFWIRBUPfuGkivblU9MX27G9NKzVTwmaK+YfaBcHcEdM5uDpExdi hXNwyNC8GP2+UkKCEq2oGNUj/DhGhsVgtAvdEmTk= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD7BF80216; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:44:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 5940CF80218; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:43:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62492F800EF for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:43:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 62492F800EF X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD50CAD33; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:43:25 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Allen Pais Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] sound: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup() In-Reply-To: References: <20200817085703.25732-1-allen.cryptic@gmail.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, keescook@chromium.org, timur@kernel.org, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clemens@ladisch.de, tiwai@suse.com, nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, Allen Pais , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:18:53 +0200, Allen Pais wrote: > > > > > Is this targeted for 5.9 or 5.10? > > This is targeted for 5.9. Well, then at the next time, please mention it explicitly in the cover letter. Usually this kind of API conversion isn't done during rc. Or it's done systematically via script or such. So unless mentioned, it's not expected to be carried to 5.9. In anyway, if the final purpose is to drop the old tasklet API and that's the plan for 5.9, all tree-wide changes have to be done in 5.9 beforehand. Was that the decision? > > I have a patch set to drop the whole tasklet usage in sound/* > > (destined for 5.10, to be submitted soon), so if that's for 5.10, > > it'll be likely superfluous. > > I have picked patches from your tree to adapt to this new API. > Those can be picked in 5.10 I suppose. Adapting the changes are trivial, don't worry. It was just a question of how to organize changes. thanks, Takashi