From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: PROC_COEF/PROC_INDEX question
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:45:14 +0200
Message-ID: <s5hmy6cyn2t.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
References: <20090807093859.GA2155@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from mx1.suse.de (cantor.suse.de [195.135.220.2])
	by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C741038B7
	for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>;
	Fri,  7 Aug 2009 11:45:15 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20090807093859.GA2155@localhost>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

At Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:38:59 +0800,
Wu Fengguang wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm not sure of the usage for GET_PROC_COEF/GET_COEF_INDEX, and found
> that their return value is unstable (changing all the time) for codec:
> 
>         Codec: Realtek ALC888
>         Address: 2
>         Function Id: 0x1
>         Vendor Id: 0x10ec0888
>         Subsystem Id: 0x80860023
>         Revision Id: 0x100202
> 
> For example:
> 
> # hda-verb /dev/snd/hwC0D2 0x20 GET_PROC_COEF 0 
> nid = 0x20, verb = 0xc00, param = 0x0
> value = 0x80
> # hda-verb /dev/snd/hwC0D2 0x20 GET_COEF_INDEX 0
> nid = 0x20, verb = 0xd00, param = 0x0
> value = 0xe
> # hda-verb /dev/snd/hwC0D2 0x20 GET_PROC_COEF 0 
> nid = 0x20, verb = 0xc00, param = 0x0
> value = 0x9c00
> # hda-verb /dev/snd/hwC0D2 0x20 GET_COEF_INDEX 0
> nid = 0x20, verb = 0xd00, param = 0x0
> value = 0xf
> 
> I wonder if this is the normal case?

AFAIK, depending on the mode, the index is incremented automatically.


Takashi