From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [PATCH alsa-lib v4 0/4] alsa-lib: ASoC: topology: Improve hw_configs Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:29:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20180416182641.30312-1-k.marinushkin@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74658266C1C for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:29:55 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20180416182641.30312-1-k.marinushkin@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Kirill Marinushkin Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Pan Xiuli , Pierre-Louis Bossart , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:26:37 +0200, Kirill Marinushkin wrote: > > Hello Takashi, > > This patch series waits since 20th of February, because it modifies UAPI headers > and should be done in sync with Linux and ALSA. I see that previously there was > no clear understanding, how to do this in sync. > > We discussed with you on 02 Apr 2018, and you suggested the following steps: > > Step 1. A person from Intel, who knows the topic (Pierre), adds his > "Reviewed-by" or "Acked-by" tags > Step 2. I clarify with Mark to apply the Linux part (different patch series) > Step 3. After that, I clarify with you to apply the ALSA part (this patch > series) > > The step 1 is done. Old patches are reviewed by Pierre, so they have his > "Reviewed-by" tag. New patches are suggested by him, and we agreed on the > implementation, so they have his "Acked-by" tag. > > The step 2 is done. Mark applied the corresponding part to his Linux tree [1]. > > Now we are on the step 3. If you don't have anything against this patch series, > please apply it to ALSA. Ideally, Mark should send the pull request for the uapi changes he applied so that they are "fixated" before going further to user-space patches. But this topology change is no intrusive ABI breakage, so I applied now as is. thanks, Takashi