From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel device IDs Audio
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:35:17 +0100
Message-ID: <s5hpozpmoru.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
References: <s5hegg6nw3s.wl-tiwai@suse.de> <563A56D3.7080304@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D601026073E
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Wed,  4 Nov 2015 22:35:17 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <563A56D3.7080304@linux.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Alexandra Yates <alexandra.yates@linux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 20:04:51 +0100,
Alexandra Yates wrote:
> 
> Hi Takashi,
> 
> On 11/03/2015 09:59 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 01:12:47 +0100,
> > Alexandra Yates wrote:
> >>
> >> Adding Intel codename Lewisburg platform device IDs for audio.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexandra Yates <alexandra.yates@linux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>   sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c | 5 +++++
> >>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> >> index c38c68f..51d6ff3 100644
> >> --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> >> +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> >> @@ -2099,6 +2099,11 @@ static const struct pci_device_id azx_ids[] = {
> >>   	/* 9 Series */
> >>   	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x8ca0),
> >>   	  .driver_data = AZX_DRIVER_PCH | AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_PCH },
> >> +	/* Lewisburg */
> >> +	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0xa1f0),
> >> +	  .driver_data = AZX_DRIVER_PCH | AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_PCH },
> >> +	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0xa270),
> >> +	  .driver_data = AZX_DRIVER_PCH | AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_PCH },
> >>   	/* Wellsburg */
> >>   	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x8d20),
> >>   	  .driver_data = AZX_DRIVER_PCH | AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_PCH },
> >
> > Is this the best position to add?  That is, is Lewisburg an older chip
> > than Wellsburg?
> 
> It is a newer chip.  Where do you suggest to add it?

A logical place would be after Wellsburg.


Takashi