From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dwc: remove 'out of memory' message Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:19:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20170225110323.7506-1-michelcatalin@gmail.com> <9da9efc3-cd9b-70a5-a764-e8be32e67d13@sakamocchi.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F993265142 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:19:43 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <9da9efc3-cd9b-70a5-a764-e8be32e67d13@sakamocchi.jp> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Sakamoto Cc: Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, colin.king@canonical.com, Mihai Burduselu List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 09:03:22 +0100, Takashi Sakamoto wrote: > > Hi, > > On Feb 25 2017 20:03, Mihai Burduselu wrote: > > Reported by checkpatch.pl > > Signed-off-by: Mihai Burduselu > > --- > > sound/soc/dwc/designware_i2s.c | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/sound/soc/dwc/designware_i2s.c b/sound/soc/dwc/designware_i2s.c > > index 9c46e4112026..6479768cc6a1 100644 > > --- a/sound/soc/dwc/designware_i2s.c > > +++ b/sound/soc/dwc/designware_i2s.c > > @@ -611,10 +611,8 @@ static int dw_i2s_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > const char *clk_id; > > > > dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); > > - if (!dev) { > > - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "kzalloc fail\n"); > > + if (!dev) > > The line for 'dev_warn()' should be kept. In general, people regard it superfluous since kmalloc() itself already gives a kernel warning at an allocation error. So removing the message is OK in that sense. However, the problem of this (and lots of other) patch is that it doesn't give proper information. Instead, in a single line, it merely declares checkpatch.pl as a bible. Very helpful, eh? So, please reconsider the changelog when you submit this kind of patches. thanks, Takashi