From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] improved snd-aloop quality when
	using	certain samplerates and kernel HZ
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:22:46 +0100
Message-ID: <s5hve468o55.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
References: <20080219030144.GA12698@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
	<20080219125046.GA6455@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
	<s5hhcg3svd4.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<20080220141906.GA15096@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
	<s5h3arnpq4i.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<20080221000601.GA4829@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
	<s5hmypusssj.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<20080222180528.GD6860@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
	<s5h7igps3nv.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<20080301115506.GA7175@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-3"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from mx1.suse.de (ns.suse.de [195.135.220.2])
	by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D0D247EC
	for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Sat,  1 Mar 2008 16:22:46 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <20080301115506.GA7175@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Ahmet =?ISO-8859-3?Q?=A9nan?= <ainan@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

At Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:55:06 +0100,
Ahmet =A9nan wrote:
> =

> > > see, that the buffer actually did go further, which is provided by th=
ese
> > > patches.
> > Applied to HG tree now.  Thanks.
> =

> could it be, that you still forgot to apply this patch, but did the other?

It was already applied but a different subject.
Please follow the standard patch style at the next time.


Takashi