From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [0/2] Jack reporting Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20080703095026.GA652@sirena.org.uk> <20080714151058.GF25448@sirena.org.uk> <20080716125053.GA17134@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <20080716112939.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> <20080717103111.GB15333@sirena.org.uk> <20080720052320.GB7853@anvil.corenet.prv> <20080720121745.GA27546@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080720121745.GA27546@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:17:48 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 01:23:20AM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > I added the switch definition to input.h and it shoudl hit the mainline > > when I ask Linus to pull early next week. > > Excellent, thanks. > > Takashi, what's the best way to handle the ALSA bits? The first patch > doesn't depend on the new switch type so could be applied as-is but the > second (adding the microphone switch type) depends on the input switch > type being added - should I resubmit that when the switch type has been > merged? Yes, please. We need also some consensus how to handle these patches covering both areas. BTW, I'll be on vacation for the next week, so the reply will be delayed. thanks, Takashi