From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>,
David.YatSin@amd.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Sunil.Khatri@amd.com, natalie.vock@gmx.de, Bincy.Mani@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix TLB invalidation fence handling
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:50:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a7fcff1-95f1-4e48-bf42-974bbb2ee856@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4a5cbd4-41b1-4c1f-ba9c-77e41e117383@amd.com>
On 10/9/26 23:23, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> On 2026-10-08 08:42, Christian König wrote:
>> After each unmap it might be necessary to invalidate the TLB to flush out
>> VM changes to the HW and make it visible to executing work.
>>
>> We tracked that as part of the vm->last_update fence, but as pointed out
>> by David it can be that this is overwritten by PDE updates when we have a
>> combined unmap/map operation.
>>
>> In that case userspace doesn't correctly wait for the TLB invalidation to
>> finish leading to all kind of problems (sq_int, page faults etc...).
>
> If I understand it correctly, you fixed this by tracking two different fences in amdgpu_vm: one that updates the sequence number, and one that signals when the TLB flush completes.
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>
> Why was cursoragent@cursor.com copied on this email?
It was CCed on Davids original mail as well.
Regards,
Christian.
> Anyway, the patch looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c | 20 ++++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 39 +++++++++----------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h | 13 ++++---
>> .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence.c | 21 +++++++---
>> 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
>> index 374f1322c3ee4..606725d0eb155 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
>> @@ -843,18 +843,24 @@ amdgpu_gem_va_update_vm(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> /*
>> * For MAP/REPLACE of non per-VM BOs we need to sync to both the
>> * bo_va->last_pt_update and vm->last_update or otherwise we
>> - * potentially miss the PDE updates.
>> + * potentially miss the PDE updates or TLB invalidation.
>> */
>> fence = dma_fence_unwrap_merge(vm->last_update,
>> + vm->last_tlb_inv,
>> bo_va->last_pt_update);
>> - if (!fence) {
>> - /* As fallback in OOM situations */
>> - dma_fence_wait(vm->last_update, false);
>> + if (!fence)
>> dma_fence_wait(bo_va->last_pt_update, false);
>> - fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
>> - }
>> +
>> } else {
>> - fence = dma_fence_get(vm->last_update);
>> + fence = dma_fence_unwrap_merge(vm->last_update,
>> + vm->last_tlb_inv);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!fence) {
>> + /* As fallback in OOM situations */
>> + dma_fence_wait(vm->last_update, false);
>> + dma_fence_wait(vm->last_tlb_inv, false);
>> + fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
>> }
>> return fence;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>> index 7d3659ef11e53..f124320345ec4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>> @@ -1071,21 +1071,16 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_tlb_seq_cb(struct dma_fence *fence,
>> */
>> static void
>> amdgpu_vm_tlb_flush(struct amdgpu_vm_update_params *params,
>> - struct dma_fence **fence,
>> + struct dma_fence *fence,
>> struct amdgpu_vm_tlb_seq_struct *tlb_cb)
>> {
>> struct amdgpu_vm *vm = params->vm;
>> tlb_cb->vm = vm;
>> - if (!fence || !*fence) {
>> - amdgpu_vm_tlb_seq_cb(NULL, &tlb_cb->cb);
>> - return;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (!dma_fence_add_callback(*fence, &tlb_cb->cb,
>> - amdgpu_vm_tlb_seq_cb)) {
>> - dma_fence_put(vm->last_tlb_flush);
>> - vm->last_tlb_flush = dma_fence_get(*fence);
>> + if (!fence || !dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &tlb_cb->cb,
>> + amdgpu_vm_tlb_seq_cb)) {
>> + dma_fence_put(vm->last_seq_flush);
>> + vm->last_seq_flush = dma_fence_get(fence);
>> } else {
>> amdgpu_vm_tlb_seq_cb(NULL, &tlb_cb->cb);
>> }
>> @@ -1095,11 +1090,12 @@ amdgpu_vm_tlb_flush(struct amdgpu_vm_update_params *params,
>> * sort out the issues with KIQ/MES TLB invalidation timeouts.
>> */
>> if (!params->unlocked && vm->need_tlb_fence) {
>> - amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence_create(params->adev, vm, fence);
>> + amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence_create(params->adev, vm, fence,
>> + &vm->last_tlb_inv);
>> /* Makes sure no PD/PT is freed before the flush */
>> - dma_resv_add_fence(vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv, *fence,
>> - DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP);
>> + dma_resv_add_fence(vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv,
>> + vm->last_tlb_inv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP);
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -1248,7 +1244,7 @@ int amdgpu_vm_update_range(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>> goto error_free;
>> if (params.needs_flush) {
>> - amdgpu_vm_tlb_flush(¶ms, fence, tlb_cb);
>> + amdgpu_vm_tlb_flush(¶ms, *fence, tlb_cb);
>> tlb_cb = NULL;
>> }
>> @@ -2647,7 +2643,8 @@ int amdgpu_vm_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>> vm->last_update = dma_fence_get_stub();
>> vm->last_unlocked = dma_fence_get_stub();
>> - vm->last_tlb_flush = dma_fence_get_stub();
>> + vm->last_seq_flush = dma_fence_get_stub();
>> + vm->last_tlb_inv = dma_fence_get_stub();
>> vm->generation = amdgpu_vm_generation(adev, NULL);
>> mutex_init(&vm->eviction_lock);
>> @@ -2691,7 +2688,8 @@ int amdgpu_vm_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>> error_free_delayed:
>> dma_fence_put(vm->last_update);
>> - dma_fence_put(vm->last_tlb_flush);
>> + dma_fence_put(vm->last_seq_flush);
>> + dma_fence_put(vm->last_tlb_inv);
>> dma_fence_put(vm->last_unlocked);
>> ttm_lru_bulk_move_fini(&adev->mman.bdev, &vm->lru_bulk_move);
>> amdgpu_vm_fini_entities(vm);
>> @@ -2834,11 +2832,12 @@ void amdgpu_vm_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm)
>> amdgpu_bo_reserve(root, true);
>> dma_fence_wait(vm->last_unlocked, false);
>> dma_fence_put(vm->last_unlocked);
>> - dma_fence_wait(vm->last_tlb_flush, false);
>> + dma_fence_wait(vm->last_seq_flush, false);
>> /* Make sure that all fence callbacks have completed */
>> - dma_fence_lock_irqsave(vm->last_tlb_flush, flags);
>> - dma_fence_unlock_irqrestore(vm->last_tlb_flush, flags);
>> - dma_fence_put(vm->last_tlb_flush);
>> + dma_fence_lock_irqsave(vm->last_seq_flush, flags);
>> + dma_fence_unlock_irqrestore(vm->last_seq_flush, flags);
>> + dma_fence_put(vm->last_seq_flush);
>> + dma_fence_put(vm->last_tlb_inv);
>> list_for_each_entry_safe(mapping, tmp, &vm->freed, list) {
>> if (mapping->flags & AMDGPU_VM_PAGE_PRT && prt_fini_needed) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
>> index 8e478d3bda1ac..713a597027bbe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
>> @@ -328,11 +328,12 @@ struct amdgpu_vm {
>> struct drm_sched_entity immediate;
>> struct drm_sched_entity delayed;
>> - /* Last finished delayed update */
>> + /* Last TLB seq/fence */
>> atomic64_t tlb_seq;
>> - struct dma_fence *last_tlb_flush;
>> + struct dma_fence *last_seq_flush;
>> atomic64_t kfd_last_flushed_seq;
>> uint64_t tlb_fence_context;
>> + struct dma_fence *last_tlb_inv;
>> /* How many times we had to re-generate the page tables */
>> uint64_t generation;
>> @@ -561,7 +562,7 @@ static inline uint64_t amdgpu_vm_tlb_seq(struct amdgpu_vm *vm)
>> * sure that the dma_fence structure isn't freed up.
>> */
>> rcu_read_lock();
>> - lock = dma_fence_spinlock(vm->last_tlb_flush);
>> + lock = dma_fence_spinlock(vm->last_seq_flush);
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>> spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
>> @@ -576,9 +577,9 @@ void amdgpu_vm_update_fault_cache(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> uint32_t status,
>> unsigned int vmhub);
>> void amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> - struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>> - struct dma_fence **fence);
>> -
>> + struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>> + struct dma_fence *dep,
>> + struct dma_fence **fence);
>> void amdgpu_vm_print_task_info(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> struct amdgpu_task_info *task_info);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence.c
>> index b0002c8983861..c91417e4df4ed 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence.c
>> @@ -75,7 +75,19 @@ static const struct dma_fence_ops amdgpu_tlb_fence_ops = {
>> .get_timeline_name = amdgpu_tlb_fence_get_timeline_name
>> };
>> -void amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>> +/**
>> + * amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence_create - create a TLB invalidation fence
>> + * @adev: the amdgpu device
>> + * @vm: the vm to use
>> + * @dep: the dependency to wait for
>> + * @fence: the resulting fence
>> + *
>> + * Creates a TLB invalidation fence which signals when all the VMIDs assigned to
>> + * the PASID of the VM are invalidated.
>> + */
>> +void amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> + struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>> + struct dma_fence *dep,
>> struct dma_fence **fence)
>> {
>> struct amdgpu_tlb_fence *f;
>> @@ -86,16 +98,15 @@ void amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm
>> * We can't fail since the PDEs and PTEs are already updated, so
>> * just block for the dependency and execute the TLB flush
>> */
>> - if (*fence)
>> - dma_fence_wait(*fence, false);
>> + if (dep)
>> + dma_fence_wait(dep, false);
>> amdgpu_gmc_flush_gpu_tlb_pasid(adev, vm->pasid, 2, true, 0);
>> - *fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
>> return;
>> }
>> f->adev = adev;
>> - f->dependency = *fence;
>> + f->dependency = dma_fence_get(dep);
>> f->pasid = vm->pasid;
>> INIT_WORK(&f->work, amdgpu_tlb_fence_work);
>> spin_lock_init(&f->lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 12:42 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix TLB invalidation fence handling Christian König
2026-10-09 21:23 ` Felix Kuehling
2026-10-14 7:50 ` Christian König [this message]
2026-10-15 13:04 ` Benjamin Cheng
2026-10-16 6:47 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a7fcff1-95f1-4e48-bf42-974bbb2ee856@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Bincy.Mani@amd.com \
--cc=David.YatSin@amd.com \
--cc=Sunil.Khatri@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=natalie.vock@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox