From: "Lazar, Lijo" <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
"Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sharma@amd.com>
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com,
"Felix Kuehling" <felix.kuehling@amd.com>,
amaranath.somalapuram@amd.com,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/amdgpu: switch workload context to/from compute
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:35:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10fa89dd-9ea6-5eee-20c8-f85c538762da@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_PavsH-=7hQjWn7aBSCVs30AYdNa_ixDUn7o-BRLh=78A@mail.gmail.com>
On 9/28/2022 2:10 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:38 AM Sharma, Shashank
> <shashank.sharma@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/27/2022 5:23 PM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>>> Am 2022-09-27 um 10:58 schrieb Sharma, Shashank:
>>>> Hello Felix,
>>>>
>>>> Thank for the review comments.
>>>>
>>>> On 9/27/2022 4:48 PM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>>>>> Am 2022-09-27 um 02:12 schrieb Christian König:
>>>>>> Am 26.09.22 um 23:40 schrieb Shashank Sharma:
>>>>>>> This patch switches the GPU workload mode to/from
>>>>>>> compute mode, while submitting compute workload.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@amd.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Feel free to add my acked-by, but Felix should probably take a look
>>>>>> as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> This look OK purely from a compute perspective. But I'm concerned
>>>>> about the interaction of compute with graphics or multiple graphics
>>>>> contexts submitting work concurrently. They would constantly override
>>>>> or disable each other's workload hints.
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, you have an amdgpu_ctx with
>>>>> AMDGPU_CTX_WORKLOAD_HINT_COMPUTE (maybe Vulkan compute) and a KFD
>>>>> process that also wants the compute profile. Those could be different
>>>>> processes belonging to different users. Say, KFD enables the compute
>>>>> profile first. Then the graphics context submits a job. At the start
>>>>> of the job, the compute profile is enabled. That's a no-op because
>>>>> KFD already enabled the compute profile. When the job finishes, it
>>>>> disables the compute profile for everyone, including KFD. That's
>>>>> unexpected.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In this case, it will not disable the compute profile, as the
>>>> reference counter will not be zero. The reset_profile() will only act
>>>> if the reference counter is 0.
>>>
>>> OK, I missed the reference counter.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> But I would be happy to get any inputs about a policy which can be
>>>> more sustainable and gets better outputs, for example:
>>>> - should we not allow a profile change, if a PP mode is already
>>>> applied and keep it Early bird basis ?
>>>>
>>>> For example: Policy A
>>>> - Job A sets the profile to compute
>>>> - Job B tries to set profile to 3D, but we do not allow it as job A is
>>>> not finished it yet.
>>>>
>>>> Or Policy B: Current one
>>>> - Job A sets the profile to compute
>>>> - Job B tries to set profile to 3D, and we allow it. Job A also runs
>>>> in PP 3D
>>>> - Job B finishes, but does not reset PP as reference count is not zero
>>>> due to compute
>>>> - Job A finishes, profile reset to NONE
>>>
>>> I think this won't work. As I understand it, the
>>> amdgpu_dpm_switch_power_profile enables and disables individual
>>> profiles. Disabling the 3D profile doesn't disable the compute profile
>>> at the same time. I think you'll need one refcount per profile.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Felix
>>
>> Thanks, This is exactly what I was looking for, I think Alex's initial
>> idea was around it, but I was under the assumption that there is only
>> one HW profile in SMU which keeps on getting overwritten. This can solve
>> our problems, as I can create an array of reference counters, and will
>> disable only the profile whose reference counter goes 0.
>
> It's been a while since I paged any of this code into my head, but I
> believe the actual workload message in the SMU is a mask where you can
> specify multiple workload types at the same time and the SMU will
> arbitrate between them internally. E.g., the most aggressive one will
> be selected out of the ones specified. I think in the driver we just
> set one bit at a time using the current interface.
Yes, this is how it works today. Only one profile is set at a time and
so setting another one will overwrite the current driver preference.
I think the current expectation of usage is from a system settings
perspective like Gaming Mode (Full screen 3D) or Cinematic mode (Video)
etc. This is also set through sysfs and there is also a Custom mode.
It's not used in the sense of a per-job setting.
It might be better
> to change the interface and just ref count the hint types and then
> when we call the set function look at the ref counts for each hint
> type and set the mask as appropriate.
>
This means a pm subsytem level change and the ref counts need to be kept
in pm layer to account for changes through sysfs or APIs.
Thanks,
Lijo
> Alex
>
>
>>
>> - Shashank
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Or anything else ?
>>>>
>>>> REgards
>>>> Shashank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Or you have multiple VCN contexts. When context1 finishes a job, it
>>>>> disables the VIDEO profile. But context2 still has a job on the other
>>>>> VCN engine and wants the VIDEO profile to still be enabled.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Felix
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
>>>>>>> index 5e53a5293935..1caed319a448 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
>>>>>>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>>>>>>> #include "amdgpu_ras.h"
>>>>>>> #include "amdgpu_umc.h"
>>>>>>> #include "amdgpu_reset.h"
>>>>>>> +#include "amdgpu_ctx_workload.h"
>>>>>>> /* Total memory size in system memory and all GPU VRAM. Used to
>>>>>>> * estimate worst case amount of memory to reserve for page tables
>>>>>>> @@ -703,9 +704,16 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_submit_ib(struct
>>>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>>>> void amdgpu_amdkfd_set_compute_idle(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>>>> bool idle)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> - amdgpu_dpm_switch_power_profile(adev,
>>>>>>> - PP_SMC_POWER_PROFILE_COMPUTE,
>>>>>>> - !idle);
>>>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + if (idle)
>>>>>>> + ret = amdgpu_clear_workload_profile(adev,
>>>>>>> AMDGPU_CTX_WORKLOAD_HINT_COMPUTE);
>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>> + ret = amdgpu_set_workload_profile(adev,
>>>>>>> AMDGPU_CTX_WORKLOAD_HINT_COMPUTE);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>>>> + drm_warn(&adev->ddev, "Failed to %s power profile to
>>>>>>> compute mode\n",
>>>>>>> + idle ? "reset" : "set");
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> bool amdgpu_amdkfd_is_kfd_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32
>>>>>>> vmid)
>>>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-28 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-26 21:40 [PATCH v3 0/5] GPU workload hints for better performance Shashank Sharma
2022-09-26 21:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/amdgpu: add UAPI for workload hints to ctx ioctl Shashank Sharma
2022-09-27 6:07 ` Christian König
2022-09-27 14:28 ` Felix Kuehling
2023-03-21 3:05 ` Marek Olšák
2023-03-21 13:00 ` Sharma, Shashank
2023-03-21 13:54 ` Christian König
2023-03-22 14:05 ` Marek Olšák
2023-03-22 14:08 ` Christian König
2023-03-22 14:24 ` Marek Olšák
2023-03-22 14:29 ` Christian König
2023-03-22 14:36 ` Marek Olšák
2023-03-22 14:52 ` Alex Deucher
2023-03-22 15:11 ` Marek Olšák
2023-03-22 14:38 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-26 21:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/amdgpu: add new functions to set GPU power profile Shashank Sharma
2022-09-27 2:14 ` Quan, Evan
2022-09-27 7:29 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 9:29 ` Quan, Evan
2022-09-27 10:00 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 6:08 ` Christian König
2022-09-27 9:58 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-27 11:41 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 12:10 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-27 12:23 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 12:39 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-27 12:53 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 13:29 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-27 13:47 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 14:00 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-27 14:20 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 14:34 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-27 14:50 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 15:20 ` Felix Kuehling
2022-09-26 21:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/amdgpu: set GPU workload via ctx IOCTL Shashank Sharma
2022-09-27 6:09 ` Christian König
2022-09-26 21:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/amdgpu: switch GPU workload profile Shashank Sharma
2022-09-27 6:11 ` Christian König
2022-09-27 10:03 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-27 11:47 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 12:20 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-27 12:25 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 16:33 ` Michel Dänzer
2022-09-27 17:06 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 17:29 ` Michel Dänzer
2022-09-26 21:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/amdgpu: switch workload context to/from compute Shashank Sharma
2022-09-27 6:12 ` Christian König
2022-09-27 14:48 ` Felix Kuehling
2022-09-27 14:58 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 15:23 ` Felix Kuehling
2022-09-27 15:38 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 20:40 ` Alex Deucher
2022-09-28 7:05 ` Lazar, Lijo [this message]
2022-09-28 8:56 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-28 9:00 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-28 21:51 ` Alex Deucher
2022-09-29 8:48 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-29 11:10 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-29 13:20 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-29 13:37 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-29 14:00 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-29 14:14 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-29 14:40 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-29 18:32 ` Alex Deucher
2022-09-30 5:08 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-30 8:37 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-30 9:13 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-30 9:22 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-30 9:54 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-30 10:09 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-29 18:07 ` Felix Kuehling
2022-09-30 4:46 ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-09-27 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] GPU workload hints for better performance Michel Dänzer
2022-09-27 16:59 ` Sharma, Shashank
2022-09-27 17:13 ` Michel Dänzer
2022-09-27 17:25 ` Sharma, Shashank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10fa89dd-9ea6-5eee-20c8-f85c538762da@amd.com \
--to=lijo.lazar@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=amaranath.somalapuram@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=shashank.sharma@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox