AMD-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shirish S <shirish.s-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
To: amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org,
	christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org,
	Monk.Liu-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org,
	Harry.Wentland-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org
Cc: Shirish S <shirish.s-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: change gfx8 ib test to use WB
Date: Fri,  8 Jun 2018 13:58:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1528446488-24377-1-git-send-email-shirish.s@amd.com> (raw)

This patch is extends the usage of WB in
gfx8's ib test which was originally
implemented in the below upstream patch
"ed9324a drm/amdgpu: change gfx9 ib test to use WB"

For reference below are the reasons for switching
to WB:

1)Because when doing IB test we don't want to involve KIQ health
status affect, and since SCRATCH register access is go through
KIQ that way GFX IB test would failed due to KIQ fail.

2)acccessing SCRATCH register cost much more time than WB method
because SCRATCH register access runs through KIQ which at least could
begin after GPU world switch back to current Guest VF

Signed-off-by: Shirish S <shirish.s@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
index 818874b..61452c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
@@ -866,26 +866,32 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_ring_test_ib(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, long timeout)
 	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
 	struct amdgpu_ib ib;
 	struct dma_fence *f = NULL;
-	uint32_t scratch;
-	uint32_t tmp = 0;
+
+	unsigned int index;
+	uint64_t gpu_addr;
+	uint32_t tmp;
 	long r;
 
-	r = amdgpu_gfx_scratch_get(adev, &scratch);
+	r = amdgpu_device_wb_get(adev, &index);
 	if (r) {
-		DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: failed to get scratch reg (%ld).\n", r);
+		dev_err(adev->dev, "(%ld) failed to allocate wb slot\n", r);
 		return r;
 	}
-	WREG32(scratch, 0xCAFEDEAD);
+
+	gpu_addr = adev->wb.gpu_addr + (index * 4);
+	adev->wb.wb[index] = cpu_to_le32(0xCAFEDEAD);
 	memset(&ib, 0, sizeof(ib));
-	r = amdgpu_ib_get(adev, NULL, 256, &ib);
+	r = amdgpu_ib_get(adev, NULL, 16, &ib);
 	if (r) {
 		DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: failed to get ib (%ld).\n", r);
 		goto err1;
 	}
-	ib.ptr[0] = PACKET3(PACKET3_SET_UCONFIG_REG, 1);
-	ib.ptr[1] = ((scratch - PACKET3_SET_UCONFIG_REG_START));
-	ib.ptr[2] = 0xDEADBEEF;
-	ib.length_dw = 3;
+	ib.ptr[0] = PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3);
+	ib.ptr[1] = WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(5) | WR_CONFIRM;
+	ib.ptr[2] = lower_32_bits(gpu_addr);
+	ib.ptr[3] = upper_32_bits(gpu_addr);
+	ib.ptr[4] = 0xDEADBEEF;
+	ib.length_dw = 5;
 
 	r = amdgpu_ib_schedule(ring, 1, &ib, NULL, &f);
 	if (r)
@@ -900,20 +906,21 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_ring_test_ib(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, long timeout)
 		DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: fence wait failed (%ld).\n", r);
 		goto err2;
 	}
-	tmp = RREG32(scratch);
+
+	tmp = adev->wb.wb[index];
 	if (tmp == 0xDEADBEEF) {
 		DRM_DEBUG("ib test on ring %d succeeded\n", ring->idx);
 		r = 0;
 	} else {
-		DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: ib test failed (scratch(0x%04X)=0x%08X)\n",
-			  scratch, tmp);
+		DRM_ERROR("ib test on ring %d failed\n", ring->idx);
 		r = -EINVAL;
 	}
+
 err2:
 	amdgpu_ib_free(adev, &ib, NULL);
 	dma_fence_put(f);
 err1:
-	amdgpu_gfx_scratch_free(adev, scratch);
+	amdgpu_device_wb_free(adev, index);
 	return r;
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2018-06-08  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-08  8:28 Shirish S [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-08  4:54 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: change gfx8 ib test to use WB Shirish S
     [not found] ` <1528433693-10399-1-git-send-email-shirish.s-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-06-08  5:23   ` zhoucm1
     [not found]     ` <e8858d26-60c5-58d6-dcc3-6cd4b6a32aaf-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-06-08  7:38       ` Christian König
     [not found]         ` <a7b2b2cc-44e4-41e0-8c65-9fc09bfd44ec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-06-08  8:37           ` S, Shirish
     [not found]             ` <4cb1a5d1-bcf9-7564-6e29-136ad565350e-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-06-08  8:37               ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1528446488-24377-1-git-send-email-shirish.s@amd.com \
    --to=shirish.s-5c7gfcevmho@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Harry.Wentland-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Monk.Liu-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox