From: "Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sharma@amd.com>
To: "Das, Nirmoy" <nirmoy.das@amd.com>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Christian.Koenig@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: cleanup debugfs for amdgpu rings
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 13:33:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b7ec90e-752a-3111-c226-25ec1d3c385f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7370b0d3-a179-1138-bbc7-728dcd131498@amd.com>
On 9/3/2021 9:44 PM, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
> Hi Shashank,
>
> On 9/3/2021 5:51 PM, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
>>
>> On 9/3/2021 5:26 PM, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/3/2021 1:39 PM, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 9/3/2021 8:36 AM, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/2/2021 5:14 PM, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>>>>>> Use debugfs_create_file_size API for creating ring debugfs
>>>>>> file, also cleanup surrounding code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c | 4 +---
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.c | 16 +++++-----------
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h | 8 +-------
>>>>>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
>>>>>> index 077f9baf74fe..dee56ab19a8f 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
>>>>>> @@ -1734,9 +1734,7 @@ int amdgpu_debugfs_init(struct amdgpu_device
>>>>>> *adev)
>>>>>> if (!ring)
>>>>>> continue;
>>>>>> - if (amdgpu_debugfs_ring_init(adev, ring)) {
>>>>>> - DRM_ERROR("Failed to register debugfs file for rings
>>>>>> !\n");
>>>>>> - }
>>>>>> + amdgpu_debugfs_ring_init(adev, ring);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> amdgpu_ras_debugfs_create_all(adev);
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.c
>>>>>> index f40753e1a60d..968521d80514 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.c
>>>>>> @@ -415,26 +415,20 @@ static const struct file_operations
>>>>>> amdgpu_debugfs_ring_fops = {
>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>> -int amdgpu_debugfs_ring_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>>> +void amdgpu_debugfs_ring_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>>> struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
>>>>>> struct drm_minor *minor = adev_to_drm(adev)->primary;
>>>>>> - struct dentry *ent, *root = minor->debugfs_root;
>>>>>> + struct dentry *root = minor->debugfs_root;
>>>>>> char name[32];
>>>>>> sprintf(name, "amdgpu_ring_%s", ring->name);
>>>>>> - ent = debugfs_create_file(name,
>>>>>> - S_IFREG | S_IRUGO, root,
>>>>>> - ring, &amdgpu_debugfs_ring_fops);
>>>>>> - if (IS_ERR(ent))
>>>>>> - return -ENOMEM;
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are we doing this ? Why to make it void from int ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We tend to ignore debugfs return values as those are not serious
>>>> errors. This to sync with rest of our
>>>>
>>>> debugfs calls.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Nirmoy
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am not suere if completely removing the provision of return value
>>> is a good way of doing it, we can always ignore it at the caller
>>> side, isn't it ?
>
>
>
> I just realized while making the change debugfs_create_file_size() is
> void return, so we don't have anything useful to return in
> amdgpu_debugfs_ring_init()
>
>
Ah, it makes better sense now. Probably just a mention in the body of
the message that we are moving from debugfs_create_file() to
debugfs_create_file_size(), will make this change of return type more
logical.
- Shashank
> Regards,
>
> Nirmoy
>
>
>>
>>
>> Yes, we are currently throwing an error msg and ignoring it. I don't
>> have a strong opinion regarding this, I will send a v2 restoring
>> previous behavior.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nirmoy
>>
>>
>>>
>>> - Shashank
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - Shashank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> - i_size_write(ent->d_inode, ring->ring_size + 12);
>>>>>> - ring->ent = ent;
>>>>>> + debugfs_create_file_size(name, S_IFREG | S_IRUGO, root, ring,
>>>>>> + &amdgpu_debugfs_ring_fops,
>>>>>> + ring->ring_size + 12);
>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> /**
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
>>>>>> index 88d80eb3fea1..c29fbce0a5b4 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
>>>>>> @@ -253,10 +253,6 @@ struct amdgpu_ring {
>>>>>> bool has_compute_vm_bug;
>>>>>> bool no_scheduler;
>>>>>> int hw_prio;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> -#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
>>>>>> - struct dentry *ent;
>>>>>> -#endif
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> #define amdgpu_ring_parse_cs(r, p, ib)
>>>>>> ((r)->funcs->parse_cs((p), (ib)))
>>>>>> @@ -356,8 +352,6 @@ static inline void
>>>>>> amdgpu_ring_write_multiple(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>>>>>> int amdgpu_ring_test_helper(struct amdgpu_ring *ring);
>>>>>> -int amdgpu_debugfs_ring_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>>> +void amdgpu_debugfs_ring_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>>> struct amdgpu_ring *ring);
>>>>>> -void amdgpu_debugfs_ring_fini(struct amdgpu_ring *ring);
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-05 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-02 11:44 [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: use IS_ERR for debugfs APIs Nirmoy Das
2021-09-02 11:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: cleanup debugfs for amdgpu rings Nirmoy Das
2021-09-03 6:36 ` Sharma, Shashank
2021-09-03 8:09 ` Das, Nirmoy
2021-09-03 15:26 ` Sharma, Shashank
2021-09-03 15:51 ` Das, Nirmoy
2021-09-03 16:14 ` Das, Nirmoy
2021-09-05 8:03 ` Sharma, Shashank [this message]
2021-09-05 11:31 ` Das, Nirmoy
2021-09-06 16:45 ` Sharma, Shashank
2021-09-08 8:54 ` Das, Nirmoy
2021-09-02 15:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: use IS_ERR for debugfs APIs Sharma, Shashank
2021-09-03 7:53 ` Christian König
2021-09-03 8:13 ` Das, Nirmoy
2021-09-03 8:17 ` Christian König
2021-09-03 15:28 ` Sharma, Shashank
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-09-02 13:43 [PATCH v2 " Nirmoy Das
2021-09-02 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: cleanup debugfs for amdgpu rings Nirmoy Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1b7ec90e-752a-3111-c226-25ec1d3c385f@amd.com \
--to=shashank.sharma@amd.com \
--cc=Christian.Koenig@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nirmoy.das@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox