From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.aiemd@gmail.com>
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com, kenny.ho@amd.com, nirmoy.das@amd.com,
christian.koenig@amd.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: individualize amdgpu entity allocation per HW IP
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:50:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200121165002.3709-1-nirmoy.das@amd.com> (raw)
Do not allocate all the entity at once. This is required for
dynamic amdgpu_ctx_entity creation.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c | 130 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
index 05c2af61e7de..91638a2a5163 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
@@ -42,16 +42,6 @@ const unsigned int amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM] = {
[AMDGPU_HW_IP_VCN_JPEG] = 1,
};
-static int amdgpu_ctx_total_num_entities(void)
-{
- unsigned i, num_entities = 0;
-
- for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i)
- num_entities += amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[i];
-
- return num_entities;
-}
-
static int amdgpu_ctx_priority_permit(struct drm_file *filp,
enum drm_sched_priority priority)
{
@@ -73,7 +63,6 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
struct drm_file *filp,
struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx)
{
- unsigned num_entities = amdgpu_ctx_total_num_entities();
unsigned i, j;
int r;
@@ -87,28 +76,29 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
ctx->adev = adev;
-
- ctx->entities[0] = kcalloc(num_entities,
+ for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i) {
+ ctx->entities[i] = kcalloc(amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[i],
sizeof(struct amdgpu_ctx_entity),
GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!ctx->entities[0])
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!ctx->entities[0]) {
+ r = -ENOMEM;
+ goto error_cleanup_entity_memory;
+ }
+ }
+ for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i)
+ for (j = 0; j < amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[i]; ++j) {
- for (i = 0; i < num_entities; ++i) {
- struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *entity = &ctx->entities[0][i];
+ struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *entity = &ctx->entities[i][j];
- entity->sequence = 1;
- entity->fences = kcalloc(amdgpu_sched_jobs,
+ entity->sequence = 1;
+ entity->fences = kcalloc(amdgpu_sched_jobs,
sizeof(struct dma_fence*), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!entity->fences) {
- r = -ENOMEM;
- goto error_cleanup_memory;
+ if (!entity->fences) {
+ r = -ENOMEM;
+ goto error_cleanup_memory;
+ }
}
- }
- for (i = 1; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i)
- ctx->entities[i] = ctx->entities[i - 1] +
- amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[i - 1];
kref_init(&ctx->refcount);
spin_lock_init(&ctx->ring_lock);
@@ -179,44 +169,52 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
return 0;
error_cleanup_entities:
- for (i = 0; i < num_entities; ++i)
- drm_sched_entity_destroy(&ctx->entities[0][i].entity);
+ for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i)
+ for (j = 0; j < amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[i]; ++j)
+ drm_sched_entity_destroy(&ctx->entities[i][j].entity);
error_cleanup_memory:
- for (i = 0; i < num_entities; ++i) {
- struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *entity = &ctx->entities[0][i];
+ for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i)
+ for (j = 0; j < amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[i]; ++j) {
+ struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *entity = &ctx->entities[i][j];
- kfree(entity->fences);
- entity->fences = NULL;
+ kfree(entity->fences);
+ entity->fences = NULL;
+ }
+
+error_cleanup_entity_memory:
+ for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i) {
+ kfree(ctx->entities[i]);
+ ctx->entities[i] = NULL;
}
- kfree(ctx->entities[0]);
- ctx->entities[0] = NULL;
return r;
}
static void amdgpu_ctx_fini(struct kref *ref)
{
struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx = container_of(ref, struct amdgpu_ctx, refcount);
- unsigned num_entities = amdgpu_ctx_total_num_entities();
struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->adev;
- unsigned i, j;
+ unsigned i, j, k;
if (!adev)
return;
+ for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i)
+ for (j = 0; j < amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[i]; ++j) {
+ struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *entity = &ctx->entities[i][j];
- for (i = 0; i < num_entities; ++i) {
- struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *entity = &ctx->entities[0][i];
+ for (k = 0; k < amdgpu_sched_jobs; ++k)
+ dma_fence_put(entity->fences[k]);
- for (j = 0; j < amdgpu_sched_jobs; ++j)
- dma_fence_put(entity->fences[j]);
+ kfree(entity->fences);
+ }
- kfree(entity->fences);
+ for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i) {
+ kfree(ctx->entities[i]);
+ ctx->entities[i] = NULL;
}
- kfree(ctx->entities[0]);
mutex_destroy(&ctx->lock);
-
kfree(ctx);
}
@@ -279,14 +277,12 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_alloc(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
static void amdgpu_ctx_do_release(struct kref *ref)
{
struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx;
- unsigned num_entities;
- u32 i;
+ u32 i, j;
ctx = container_of(ref, struct amdgpu_ctx, refcount);
-
- num_entities = amdgpu_ctx_total_num_entities();
- for (i = 0; i < num_entities; i++)
- drm_sched_entity_destroy(&ctx->entities[0][i].entity);
+ for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i)
+ for (j = 0; j < amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[i]; ++j)
+ drm_sched_entity_destroy(&ctx->entities[i][j].entity);
amdgpu_ctx_fini(ref);
}
@@ -516,20 +512,21 @@ struct dma_fence *amdgpu_ctx_get_fence(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
void amdgpu_ctx_priority_override(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
enum drm_sched_priority priority)
{
- unsigned num_entities = amdgpu_ctx_total_num_entities();
enum drm_sched_priority ctx_prio;
- unsigned i;
+ unsigned i, j;
ctx->override_priority = priority;
ctx_prio = (ctx->override_priority == DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_UNSET) ?
ctx->init_priority : ctx->override_priority;
+ for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i)
+ for (j = 0; j < amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[i]; ++j) {
- for (i = 0; i < num_entities; i++) {
- struct drm_sched_entity *entity = &ctx->entities[0][i].entity;
+ struct drm_sched_entity *entity =
+ &ctx->entities[i][j].entity;
- drm_sched_entity_set_priority(entity, ctx_prio);
- }
+ drm_sched_entity_set_priority(entity, ctx_prio);
+ }
}
int amdgpu_ctx_wait_prev_fence(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
@@ -564,20 +561,20 @@ void amdgpu_ctx_mgr_init(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr)
long amdgpu_ctx_mgr_entity_flush(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr, long timeout)
{
- unsigned num_entities = amdgpu_ctx_total_num_entities();
struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx;
struct idr *idp;
- uint32_t id, i;
+ uint32_t id, i, j;
idp = &mgr->ctx_handles;
mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
idr_for_each_entry(idp, ctx, id) {
- for (i = 0; i < num_entities; i++) {
- struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
+ for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i)
+ for (j = 0; j < amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[i]; ++j) {
+ struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
- entity = &ctx->entities[0][i].entity;
- timeout = drm_sched_entity_flush(entity, timeout);
+ entity = &ctx->entities[i][j].entity;
+ timeout = drm_sched_entity_flush(entity, timeout);
}
}
mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
@@ -586,10 +583,9 @@ long amdgpu_ctx_mgr_entity_flush(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr, long timeout)
void amdgpu_ctx_mgr_entity_fini(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr)
{
- unsigned num_entities = amdgpu_ctx_total_num_entities();
struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx;
struct idr *idp;
- uint32_t id, i;
+ uint32_t id, i, j;
idp = &mgr->ctx_handles;
@@ -598,9 +594,13 @@ void amdgpu_ctx_mgr_entity_fini(struct amdgpu_ctx_mgr *mgr)
DRM_ERROR("ctx %p is still alive\n", ctx);
continue;
}
+ for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM; ++i)
+ for (j = 0; j < amdgpu_ctx_num_entities[i]; ++j) {
+ struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
- for (i = 0; i < num_entities; i++)
- drm_sched_entity_fini(&ctx->entities[0][i].entity);
+ entity = &ctx->entities[i][j].entity;
+ drm_sched_entity_fini(entity);
+ }
}
}
--
2.24.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2020-01-21 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-21 16:50 Nirmoy Das [this message]
2020-01-21 16:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: allocate entities on demand Nirmoy Das
2020-01-22 0:07 ` Luben Tuikov
2020-01-22 9:25 ` Nirmoy
2020-01-22 15:51 ` Luben Tuikov
2020-01-21 23:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: individualize amdgpu entity allocation per HW IP Luben Tuikov
2020-01-22 9:32 ` Nirmoy
2020-01-22 16:24 ` Luben Tuikov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-01-22 9:33 Nirmoy Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200121165002.3709-1-nirmoy.das@amd.com \
--to=nirmoy.aiemd@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=kenny.ho@amd.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox