From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CE08C369D4 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F98F10E96D; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gysEpwlV"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFE1910E96D; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1795C5744; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4BC4C4CEC3; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:51:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1727265068; bh=oGQnSzjkJ9ii2c2vUWL5h9SFe4jaWw+1mulU4/XGYm4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gysEpwlV2ISjlx4GdkLsGvEHlwtOT2YFyMDxVOKSQaR0Ay831yyzy6gqEKZTh9a1S 75xtmSakIeSb6OQVUfsAJTxkm+2sff2/ZJdDNpwMJDZPo+y+xP4kpouWkxF0a6dc+Q wYqKKWNnjedx2JwVmylAwEdH3TNMd5W5GOfbEkj4go/PrfcT1OiVsp9HL3tbijQ1qP vXMUwF52nIYDfAHLJCP6I9Fno6lAnXUoJw+2xHxGG8GlNSxSzANXetX5rfjcXxRD8/ gwuzZwTZB96gPuMAd3eDKdHKGjiVYN3whRPGnsePZ9PAw/o+jC+UV6g7B9O257x/5z Me5B79GO0Bzew== From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tim Huang , Jesse Zhang , Alex Deucher , Sasha Levin , christian.koenig@amd.com, Xinhui.Pan@amd.com, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, Hawking.Zhang@amd.com, Jack.Xiao@amd.com, srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com, tao.zhou1@amd.com, mario.limonciello@amd.com, Stanley.Yang@amd.com, victorchengchi.lu@amd.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.11 203/244] drm/amdgpu: fix unchecked return value warning for amdgpu_gfx Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:27:04 -0400 Message-ID: <20240925113641.1297102-203-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240925113641.1297102-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20240925113641.1297102-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore X-stable-base: Linux 6.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for AMD gfx List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "amd-gfx" From: Tim Huang [ Upstream commit c0277b9d7c2ee9ee5dbc948548984f0fbb861301 ] This resolves the unchecded return value warning reported by Coverity. Signed-off-by: Tim Huang Reviewed-by: Jesse Zhang Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c index 1849510a308ad..3ff39d3ec317c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c @@ -882,8 +882,11 @@ int amdgpu_gfx_ras_late_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct ras_common_if *r int r; if (amdgpu_ras_is_supported(adev, ras_block->block)) { - if (!amdgpu_persistent_edc_harvesting_supported(adev)) - amdgpu_ras_reset_error_status(adev, AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__GFX); + if (!amdgpu_persistent_edc_harvesting_supported(adev)) { + r = amdgpu_ras_reset_error_status(adev, AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__GFX); + if (r) + return r; + } r = amdgpu_ras_block_late_init(adev, ras_block); if (r) @@ -1027,7 +1030,10 @@ uint32_t amdgpu_kiq_rreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg, uint32_t xcc_ pr_err("critical bug! too many kiq readers\n"); goto failed_unlock; } - amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32); + r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32); + if (r) + goto failed_unlock; + amdgpu_ring_emit_rreg(ring, reg, reg_val_offs); r = amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT); if (r) @@ -1093,7 +1099,10 @@ void amdgpu_kiq_wreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg, uint32_t v, uint3 } spin_lock_irqsave(&kiq->ring_lock, flags); - amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32); + r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32); + if (r) + goto failed_unlock; + amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, reg, v); r = amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT); if (r) @@ -1129,6 +1138,7 @@ void amdgpu_kiq_wreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg, uint32_t v, uint3 failed_undo: amdgpu_ring_undo(ring); +failed_unlock: spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags); failed_kiq_write: dev_err(adev->dev, "failed to write reg:%x\n", reg); -- 2.43.0