From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79A4ECDE01A for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C70C10E22D; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="EYUxZogh"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7858010E22D; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:31:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1763105467; x=1794641467; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=YqUWGkPbN/V/TNvPETtR8gEtdGo82kPHsqkE8jDKi9Q=; b=EYUxZoghjDjIYm/rPTAQDWZHKPkvxnGEdYq4BdoqzA44el27x/GxPB9t +o2y5gOuAmPNFA9c0CcLAl4S3CYir5cLzXPfzRBMyUlMpVbLDHd222RW/ /1uqtUTL9iDNz8sLAdim9bVmEfa2kUj/ZQzqwk9TMH+YpPAdlcSOAwI3o Uw2goBk/DFaDsdrzzzaTHVpVywUnJC7htysVIEGKtgNaJTA90Qhr+0PJ1 4wA3DSaRtiwzxy3lSBMq9Tsm8ejHsG/F+ng9sEtnGdTSPzQmEThU2wXkq DTqPoErNkVsP02vrFmqRCBvf7cmrNjmR5tR+jrfgxUWb4rDbN3DnEpz/m g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rcLTuaL1S4aFxLm5a9nB5A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4NCafxZ2QkKMPxhRVF9goA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11612"; a="64201504" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,304,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="64201504" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Nov 2025 23:31:07 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: KJKJ9fdmQW63RP8Wa1dZ3w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: mfThGXB1SpW2ZGEEWO0+1A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,304,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="220572128" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 7b01c990427b) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2025 23:31:04 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 7b01c990427b with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vJoGs-0006Ix-17; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:31:02 +0000 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 15:30:22 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , phasta@mailbox.org, alexdeucher@gmail.com, simona.vetter@ffwll.ch, tursulin@ursulin.net, matthew.brost@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, sumit.semwal@linaro.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] dma-buf: inline spinlock for fence protection v2 Message-ID: <202511141529.mZKt8xhV-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251113145332.16805-5-christian.koenig@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251113145332.16805-5-christian.koenig@amd.com> X-BeenThere: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for AMD gfx List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "amd-gfx" Hi Christian, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on next-20251113] [also build test ERROR on v6.18-rc5] [cannot apply to drm-xe/drm-xe-next linus/master v6.18-rc5 v6.18-rc4 v6.18-rc3] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-K-nig/dma-buf-protected-fence-ops-by-RCU-v3/20251113-235209 base: next-20251113 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251113145332.16805-5-christian.koenig%40amd.com patch subject: [PATCH 04/18] dma-buf: inline spinlock for fence protection v2 config: arm-randconfig-004-20251114 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251114/202511141529.mZKt8xhV-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 0bba1e76581bad04e7d7f09f5115ae5e2989e0d9) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251114/202511141529.mZKt8xhV-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511141529.mZKt8xhV-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence.c:454:19: error: no member named 'lock' in 'struct dma_fence' 454 | spin_lock_irq(f->lock); | ~ ^ drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence.c:455:21: error: no member named 'lock' in 'struct dma_fence' 455 | spin_unlock_irq(f->lock); | ~ ^ 2 errors generated. vim +454 drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence.c 2989f6451084ae Chris Wilson 2019-08-19 451 2989f6451084ae Chris Wilson 2019-08-19 452 static void __wait_for_callbacks(struct dma_fence *f) 2989f6451084ae Chris Wilson 2019-08-19 453 { 2989f6451084ae Chris Wilson 2019-08-19 @454 spin_lock_irq(f->lock); 2989f6451084ae Chris Wilson 2019-08-19 455 spin_unlock_irq(f->lock); 2989f6451084ae Chris Wilson 2019-08-19 456 } 2989f6451084ae Chris Wilson 2019-08-19 457 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki