From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
phasta@mailbox.org, alexdeucher@gmail.com,
simona.vetter@ffwll.ch, tursulin@ursulin.net,
matthew.brost@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] drm/amdgpu: independence for the amdkfd_fence! v2
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 19:43:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202511141921.NxnbQ4Zt-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251113145332.16805-14-christian.koenig@amd.com>
Hi Christian,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20251113]
[cannot apply to drm-xe/drm-xe-next linus/master v6.18-rc5 v6.18-rc4 v6.18-rc3 v6.18-rc5]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-K-nig/dma-buf-protected-fence-ops-by-RCU-v3/20251113-235209
base: next-20251113
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251113145332.16805-14-christian.koenig%40amd.com
patch subject: [PATCH 13/18] drm/amdgpu: independence for the amdkfd_fence! v2
config: riscv-randconfig-001-20251114 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251114/202511141921.NxnbQ4Zt-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.4.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251114/202511141921.NxnbQ4Zt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511141921.NxnbQ4Zt-lkp@intel.com/
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c: In function 'amdkfd_fence_signal':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c:162:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'dma_fence_lock_irqsafe'; did you mean 'dma_fence_lock_irqsave'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
162 | dma_fence_lock_irqsafe(f, flags)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| dma_fence_lock_irqsave
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c:162:41: error: expected ';' before 'if'
162 | dma_fence_lock_irqsafe(f, flags)
| ^
| ;
163 | if (fence->mm) {
| ~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c:169:1: error: expected ';' before '}' token
169 | }
| ^
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c:159:37: warning: unused variable 'fence' [-Wunused-variable]
159 | struct amdgpu_amdkfd_fence *fence = to_amdgpu_amdkfd_fence(f);
| ^~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +162 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c
156
157 void amdkfd_fence_signal(struct dma_fence *f)
158 {
> 159 struct amdgpu_amdkfd_fence *fence = to_amdgpu_amdkfd_fence(f);
160 long flags;
161
> 162 dma_fence_lock_irqsafe(f, flags)
163 if (fence->mm) {
164 mmdrop(fence->mm);
165 fence->mm = NULL;
166 }
167 dma_fence_signal_locked(f);
168 dma_fence_unlock_irqrestore(f, flags)
> 169 }
170
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-14 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-13 14:51 Independence for dma_fences! v3 Christian König
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 01/18] dma-buf: cleanup dma_fence_describe v3 Christian König
2025-11-20 14:09 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-27 10:17 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 02/18] dma-buf: protected fence ops by RCU v3 Christian König
2025-11-14 10:50 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-18 14:28 ` Christian König
2025-11-18 16:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-20 14:03 ` Christian König
2025-11-20 14:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 03/18] dma-buf: detach fence ops on signal v2 Christian König
2025-11-20 14:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-27 10:29 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 04/18] dma-buf: inline spinlock for fence protection v2 Christian König
2025-11-13 20:49 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-14 7:30 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-14 11:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-27 10:44 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 05/18] dma-buf: use inline lock for the stub fence Christian König
2025-11-27 10:50 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-28 12:31 ` Christian König
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 06/18] dma-buf: use inline lock for the dma-fence-array Christian König
2025-11-27 10:51 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 07/18] dma-buf: use inline lock for the dma-fence-chain Christian König
2025-11-27 10:52 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 08/18] drm/sched: use inline locks for the drm-sched-fence Christian König
2025-11-13 16:23 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-17 15:32 ` Christian König
2025-11-18 7:10 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-20 14:17 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 09/18] drm/amdgpu: fix KFD eviction fence enable_signaling path Christian König
2025-11-27 10:57 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-28 10:01 ` Christian König
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 10/18] drm/amdgpu: independence for the amdgpu_fence! Christian König
2025-11-20 14:42 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 11/18] drm/amdgpu: independence for the amdgpu_eviction_fence! Christian König
2025-11-27 11:02 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 12/18] drm/amdgpu: independence for the amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence! Christian König
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 13/18] drm/amdgpu: independence for the amdkfd_fence! v2 Christian König
2025-11-14 11:43 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-11-27 11:10 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-28 10:06 ` Christian König
2025-11-28 10:10 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-28 10:12 ` Christian König
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 14/18] drm/amdgpu: independence for the amdgpu_userq__fence! Christian König
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/xe: Disconnect the low hanging fences from Xe module Christian König
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 16/18] drm/xe: Drop HW fence slab Christian König
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 17/18] drm/xe: Promote xe_hw_fence_irq to an ref counted object Christian König
2025-11-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 18/18] drm/xe: Finish disconnect HW fences from module Christian König
2025-11-27 11:17 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-13 16:20 ` Independence for dma_fences! v3 Philipp Stanner
2025-11-17 15:28 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202511141921.NxnbQ4Zt-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phasta@mailbox.org \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox