From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01ADCC6B3B for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CD210EB9E; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sea.source.kernel.org (sea.source.kernel.org [172.234.252.31]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB13810E172; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 17:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7156940856; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 17:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 330F01F000C4; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 17:44:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1791999896; bh=sTxxFIiD6mgFs2UdEY1I8MyQnekZZiyPvhQw7RuhHrg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Y/JbqQJUIEWFLFscjenxW9GCe5wNUa4lKG/qtufKEMdVe8I7JjwbgDqX5hbrhnbnk g11pdaabApMfzBMkfpM3w5n1u6n4ty6P15W2DYuVy6e5rpnrYB4vdZc0i3KcsTyQQY TKLv1ClTGNe42312p3oiyQs34X3dYVxDiKaB2oxQ= Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 19:45:00 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Kees Cook , Ian Rogers , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Danilo Krummrich , Miguel Ojeda , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Jonathan Corbet , Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Christophe Leroy , Nayna Jain , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Viresh Kumar , David Teigland , Alexander Aring , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Oleksandr Tyshchenko , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Richard Weinberger , Zhihao Cheng , Felix Kuehling , Alex Deucher , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , driver-core@lists.linux.dev, llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, gfs2@lists.linux.dev, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] kobject: Require explicit initialization of struct kobj_type::release Message-ID: <2026101434-scam-padding-87a5@gregkh> References: <20261013223946.1836757-1-irogers@google.com> <2026101425-why-boring-4f2d@gregkh> <202610140932.5F9CFCE5@keescook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:21:44 +0000 X-BeenThere: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for AMD gfx List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "amd-gfx" On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 06:44:18PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 6:37 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > > > I'd really like to have the attribute available, and I've got at least > > one user I can apply today that don't require fix-ups (seq_file), so > > if Miguel is okay with it, I'd like to snag patch 1 and send it with > > my seq_file "first user" for this coming merge window so it's available > > starting with v7.4-rc1, and we don't end up needing to wait 10 weeks for > > other subsystems to be able to use it. And the kobj fixups can continue > > in parallel. Does that sounds okay? > > Of course, please feel free to pick it up (with the small tweak I > requested) if you have a user. > > And if you don't pick the user, I could still pick the first patch up > through the compiler attributes tree if you and other folks want to > use it after -rc1. > > Greg: adding the attribute itself should be safe and would unblock > others that may want to "protect" themselves, without having to wait > for every potential user to get fixed (but of course I agree they > should get fixed -- we should not forget about them, if that is your > concern). I agree, not a problem to add the attribute now as long as it doesn't break the build. thanks, greg k-h