AMD-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Jesse Zhang <Jesse.Zhang@amd.com>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, Prike Liang <prike.liang@amd.com>,
	Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/amdgpu: don't wait for the SPM VMID's jobs under the VMID manager lock
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 13:33:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20e90363-511b-451b-8523-e07a7d6a960e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020083804.2777099-1-Jesse.Zhang@amd.com>



On 10/20/26 10:37, Jesse Zhang wrote:
> amdgpu_vmid_free_spm() waits for the jobs of the reserved VMID while
> holding the VMID manager lock of the hub, which every VMID grab on the
> hub takes as well. Freeing the reservation, by UNRESERVE_VMID or when
> the VM is destroyed, so stalls the kernel queue submissions of every
> process on the GFXHUB until those jobs completed, or until the job
> timeout if one of them hangs. A full GPU reset even deadlocks, since
> amdgpu_vmid_reset_all() needs the lock before the scheduler is started
> again to signal the jobs.
> 
> On navi31, with a GFX job of the reserving process that waits for 1s,
> an unrelated process' SDMA NOP takes 0.8s instead of no time when the
> VMID gets unreserved meanwhile.
> 
> Nothing adds to the active fences of the VMID once it's no longer the
> VM's reserved one, so drop the lock while waiting for them. Keep the
> VMID reserved until then, so that nobody else can bind it before.
> 
> Fixes: 9b47649cabf4 ("drm/amdgpu: bind the SPM VMID's page table to the reserving VM")
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Zhang <Jesse.Zhang@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c
> index 1482fc031d44..d19bbcf25765 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c
> @@ -645,17 +645,18 @@ void amdgpu_vmid_free_spm(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&id_mgr->lock);
>  	id = vm->reserved_vmid[vmhub];
> -	if (id) {
> -		vm->reserved_vmid[vmhub] = NULL;
> -		id_mgr->reserved_vmid = false;
> +	vm->reserved_vmid[vmhub] = NULL;
> +	mutex_unlock(&id_mgr->lock);
> +	if (!id)
> +		return;
>  
> -		/* Only for kernel queues and kfd/userqueues by pass that */
> -		amdgpu_sync_wait(&id->active, false);
> +	amdgpu_sync_wait(&id->active, false);

Accessing id->active without holding the lock is a pretty big no-go as well.

We should probably rather move the amdgpu_sync_wait into the caller of the function and wait for vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv instead.

That should have the same effect, but we don't need to hold the VMID lock for that.

Regards,
Christian.

>  
> -		if (adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid && adev->gfxhub.funcs)
> -			amdgpu_gmc_bind_vmid(adev, AMDGPU_GFXHUB(0),
> -					     adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid, 0);
> -	}
> +	mutex_lock(&id_mgr->lock);
> +	if (adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid && adev->gfxhub.funcs)
> +		amdgpu_gmc_bind_vmid(adev, AMDGPU_GFXHUB(0),
> +				     adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid, 0);
> +	id_mgr->reserved_vmid = false;
>  	mutex_unlock(&id_mgr->lock);
>  }
>  


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-20 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-20  8:37 [PATCH 1/3] drm/amdgpu: don't wait for the SPM VMID's jobs under the VMID manager lock Jesse Zhang
2026-10-20  8:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/amdgpu: keep the CS user fence BO in GTT Jesse Zhang
2026-10-20  8:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: reject CS chunks too large for kvmalloc() Jesse Zhang
2026-10-20 11:36   ` Christian König
2026-10-20 11:33 ` Christian König [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20e90363-511b-451b-8523-e07a7d6a960e@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=Jesse.Zhang@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=prike.liang@amd.com \
    --cc=sunil.khatri@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox