AMD-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)" <alex.sierra@amd.com>
To: philip yang <yangp@amd.com>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: avoid recursive lock in migrations back to RAM
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 10:54:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38f47a35-4212-dc20-20ed-ef60659bcda5@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86db53c1-538a-c479-fffd-88888141c2e6@amd.com>


On 11/2/2021 10:04 AM, philip yang wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-11-01 10:40 p.m., Alex Sierra wrote:
>> [Why]:
>> When we call hmm_range_fault to map memory after a migration, we don't
>> expect memory to be migrated again as a result of hmm_range_fault. The
>> driver ensures that all memory is in GPU-accessible locations so that
>> no migration should be needed. However, there is one corner case where
>> hmm_range_fault can unexpectedly cause a migration from DEVICE_PRIVATE
>> back to system memory due to a write-fault when a system memory page in
>> the same range was mapped read-only (e.g. COW). Ranges with individual
>> pages in different locations are usually the result of failed page
>> migrations (e.g. page lock contention). The unexpected migration back
>> to system memory causes a deadlock from recursive locking in our
>> driver.
>>
>> [How]:
>> Creating a task reference new member under svm_range_list_init struct.
>> Setting this with "current" reference, right before the hmm_range_fault
>> is called. This member is checked against "current" reference at
>> svm_migrate_to_ram callback function. If equal, the migration will be
>> ignored.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Sierra<alex.sierra@amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c | 4 ++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h    | 1 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c     | 2 ++
>>   3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
>> index bff40e8bca67..eb19f44ec86d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
>> @@ -936,6 +936,10 @@ static vm_fault_t svm_migrate_to_ram(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>>   		pr_debug("failed find process at fault address 0x%lx\n", addr);
>>   		return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>>   	}
>> +	if (READ_ONCE(p->svms.faulting_task) == current) {
>> +		pr_debug("skipping ram migration\n");
>
> need release refcount to avoid process leaking
>
> kfd_unref_process(p);
>
Good catch. Thanks Phillip.

Alex Sierra

> Regards,
>
> Philip
>
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>>   	addr >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
>>   	pr_debug("CPU page fault svms 0x%p address 0x%lx\n", &p->svms, addr);
>>   
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
>> index f88666bdf57c..7b41a58b1ade 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
>> @@ -858,6 +858,7 @@ struct svm_range_list {
>>   	atomic_t			evicted_ranges;
>>   	struct delayed_work		restore_work;
>>   	DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap_supported, MAX_GPU_INSTANCE);
>> +	struct task_struct 		*faulting_task;
>>   };
>>   
>>   /* Process data */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
>> index 939c863315ba..4031c2a67af4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
>> @@ -1492,9 +1492,11 @@ static int svm_range_validate_and_map(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>   
>>   		next = min(vma->vm_end, end);
>>   		npages = (next - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +		WRITE_ONCE(p->svms.faulting_task, current);
>>   		r = amdgpu_hmm_range_get_pages(&prange->notifier, mm, NULL,
>>   					       addr, npages, &hmm_range,
>>   					       readonly, true, owner);
>> +		WRITE_ONCE(p->svms.faulting_task, NULL);
>>   		if (r) {
>>   			pr_debug("failed %d to get svm range pages\n", r);
>>   			goto unreserve_out;

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-02 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-02  2:40 [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: avoid recursive lock in migrations back to RAM Alex Sierra
2021-11-02 14:18 ` Felix Kuehling
2021-11-02 15:04 ` philip yang
2021-11-02 15:54   ` Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex) [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-01 22:04 Alex Sierra
2021-11-01 23:28 ` Felix Kuehling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=38f47a35-4212-dc20-20ed-ef60659bcda5@amd.com \
    --to=alex.sierra@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=yangp@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox