From: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@amd.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com, Arvind.Yadav@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/amdgpu: accommodate DOMAIN/PL_DOORBELL
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:24:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <447afcd9-719a-bf86-64ee-af8e8a7c67dd@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7cfbd8c6-7865-2fe3-ac93-d3b264f2b4ab@amd.com>
On 14/02/2023 19:31, Christian König wrote:
> Am 14.02.23 um 17:15 schrieb Shashank Sharma:
>> From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>>
>> This patch adds changes:
>> - to accommodate the new GEM domain DOORBELL
>> - to accommodate the new TTM PL DOORBELL
>>
>> to manage doorbell allocations as GEM Objects.
>>
>> V2: Addressed reviwe comments from Christian
>> - drop the doorbell changes for pinning/unpinning
>> - drop the doorbell changes for dma-buf map
>> - drop the doorbell changes for sgt
>> - no need to handle TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS for doorbell
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> index b48c9fd60c43..ff9979fecfd2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> @@ -147,6 +147,14 @@ void amdgpu_bo_placement_from_domain(struct
>> amdgpu_bo *abo, u32 domain)
>> c++;
>> }
>> + if (domain & AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_DOORBELL) {
>> + places[c].fpfn = 0;
>> + places[c].lpfn = 0;
>> + places[c].mem_type = AMDGPU_PL_DOORBELL;
>> + places[c].flags = 0;
>> + c++;
>> + }
>> +
>
> Mhm, do we need to increase AMDGPU_BO_MAX_PLACEMENTS?
>
> I think the answer is *no* since mixing DOORBELL with CPU, GTT or VRAM
> placement doesn't make sense, but do we enforce that somewhere?
I am not sure why do we need that ?
>
>> if (domain & AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT) {
>> places[c].fpfn = 0;
>> places[c].lpfn = 0;
>> @@ -466,7 +474,7 @@ static bool amdgpu_bo_validate_size(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>> goto fail;
>> }
>> - /* TODO add more domains checks, such as AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU */
>> + /* TODO add more domains checks, such as AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU,
>> AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_DOORBELL */
>
> Should we enforce that user space can only allocate 1 page doorbells?
>
Should we add a per-PID basis check ?
- Shashank
>> return true;
>> fail:
>> @@ -1014,6 +1022,7 @@ void amdgpu_bo_unpin(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
>> } else if (bo->tbo.resource->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT) {
>> atomic64_sub(amdgpu_bo_size(bo), &adev->gart_pin_size);
>> }
>> +
>
> Unrelated change.
Noted
- Shashank
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>> }
>> static const char *amdgpu_vram_names[] = {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>> index 0e8f580769ab..e9dc24191fc8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>> @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ static void amdgpu_evict_flags(struct
>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> case AMDGPU_PL_GDS:
>> case AMDGPU_PL_GWS:
>> case AMDGPU_PL_OA:
>> + case AMDGPU_PL_DOORBELL:
>> placement->num_placement = 0;
>> placement->num_busy_placement = 0;
>> return;
>> @@ -500,9 +501,11 @@ static int amdgpu_bo_move(struct
>> ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
>> if (old_mem->mem_type == AMDGPU_PL_GDS ||
>> old_mem->mem_type == AMDGPU_PL_GWS ||
>> old_mem->mem_type == AMDGPU_PL_OA ||
>> + old_mem->mem_type == AMDGPU_PL_DOORBELL ||
>> new_mem->mem_type == AMDGPU_PL_GDS ||
>> new_mem->mem_type == AMDGPU_PL_GWS ||
>> - new_mem->mem_type == AMDGPU_PL_OA) {
>> + new_mem->mem_type == AMDGPU_PL_OA ||
>> + new_mem->mem_type == AMDGPU_PL_DOORBELL) {
>> /* Nothing to save here */
>> ttm_bo_move_null(bo, new_mem);
>> goto out;
>> @@ -586,6 +589,11 @@ static int amdgpu_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct
>> ttm_device *bdev,
>> mem->bus.offset += adev->gmc.vram_aper_base;
>> mem->bus.is_iomem = true;
>> break;
>> + case AMDGPU_PL_DOORBELL:
>> + mem->bus.offset = mem->start << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + mem->bus.offset += adev->doorbell.doorbell_aper_base;
>> + mem->bus.is_iomem = true;
>> + break;
>> default:
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> @@ -1267,6 +1275,7 @@ uint64_t amdgpu_ttm_tt_pde_flags(struct ttm_tt
>> *ttm, struct ttm_resource *mem)
>> flags |= AMDGPU_PTE_VALID;
>> if (mem && (mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT ||
>> + mem->mem_type == AMDGPU_PL_DOORBELL ||
>> mem->mem_type == AMDGPU_PL_PREEMPT)) {
>> flags |= AMDGPU_PTE_SYSTEM;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>> index 967b265dbfa1..9cf5d8419965 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>> #define AMDGPU_PL_GWS (TTM_PL_PRIV + 1)
>> #define AMDGPU_PL_OA (TTM_PL_PRIV + 2)
>> #define AMDGPU_PL_PREEMPT (TTM_PL_PRIV + 3)
>> +#define AMDGPU_PL_DOORBELL (TTM_PL_PRIV + 4)
>> #define AMDGPU_GTT_MAX_TRANSFER_SIZE 512
>> #define AMDGPU_GTT_NUM_TRANSFER_WINDOWS 2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-14 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-14 16:15 [PATCH v2 0/8] Re-design doorbell framework for usermode queues Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/amdgpu: add UAPI for allocating doorbell memory Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 18:22 ` Christian König
2023-02-14 19:02 ` Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/amdgpu: replace aper_base_kaddr with vram_aper_base_kaddr Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 18:24 ` Christian König
2023-02-14 19:03 ` Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drm/amdgpu: rename gmc.aper_base/size Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 18:25 ` Christian König
2023-02-14 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/amdgpu: rename doorbell variables Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 18:27 ` Christian König
2023-02-14 19:16 ` Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/amdgpu: accommodate DOMAIN/PL_DOORBELL Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 18:31 ` Christian König
2023-02-14 19:24 ` Shashank Sharma [this message]
2023-02-15 6:17 ` Christian König
2023-02-15 13:32 ` Shashank Sharma
2023-02-15 13:36 ` Christian König
2023-02-15 13:45 ` Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/amdgpu: get doorbell memory Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/amdgpu: create doorbell kernel object Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 18:35 ` Christian König
2023-02-14 19:26 ` Shashank Sharma
2023-02-16 13:13 ` Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] drm/amdgpu: start using kernel doorbell bo Shashank Sharma
2023-02-14 18:40 ` Christian König
2023-02-14 19:28 ` Shashank Sharma
2023-02-15 6:18 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=447afcd9-719a-bf86-64ee-af8e8a7c67dd@amd.com \
--to=shashank.sharma@amd.com \
--cc=Arvind.Yadav@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox