From: "Ma, Jun" <majun@amd.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Ma Jun" <Jun.Ma2@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Alexander.Deucher@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd: Fix the flag setting code for interrupt request
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 19:22:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <476e4c97-e0a9-8e56-57a4-411be1620da7@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c792b2e-5c2d-840c-e14c-b225880a0d65@amd.com>
On 9/6/2023 3:23 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 06.09.23 um 08:55 schrieb Ma Jun:
>> [1] Remove the irq flags setting code since pci_alloc_irq_vectors()
>> handles these flags.
>> [2] Free the msi vectors in case of error.
>>
>> v2:
>> - Remove local variable initializing code (Christian)
>> - Use PCI_IRQ_ALL_TYPES (Alex)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ma Jun <Jun.Ma2@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_irq.c | 45 ++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_irq.c
>> index fa6d0adcec20..64c245015e17 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_irq.c
>> @@ -270,29 +270,29 @@ static void amdgpu_restore_msix(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> */
>> int amdgpu_irq_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> {
>> - int r = 0;
>> - unsigned int irq;
>> + int r;
>> + unsigned int irq, flags;
>
> It's also good style to define variables like "r" and "i" last. Some
> upstream maintainers even require reverse xmas tree style defines (e.g.
> longest first, shortest last).
>
> With that changed the patch is Acked-by: Christian König
> <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>
Thanks, I will update it when push.
Regards,
Ma Jun
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>>
>> spin_lock_init(&adev->irq.lock);
>>
>> /* Enable MSI if not disabled by module parameter */
>> adev->irq.msi_enabled = false;
>>
>> + if (!amdgpu_msi_ok(adev))
>> + flags = PCI_IRQ_LEGACY;
>> + else
>> + flags = PCI_IRQ_ALL_TYPES;
>> +
>> + /* we only need one vector */
>> + r = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(adev->pdev, 1, 1, flags);
>> + if (r < 0) {
>> + dev_err(adev->dev, "Failed to alloc msi vectors\n");
>> + return r;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (amdgpu_msi_ok(adev)) {
>> - int nvec = pci_msix_vec_count(adev->pdev);
>> - unsigned int flags;
>> -
>> - if (nvec <= 0)
>> - flags = PCI_IRQ_MSI;
>> - else
>> - flags = PCI_IRQ_MSI | PCI_IRQ_MSIX;
>> -
>> - /* we only need one vector */
>> - nvec = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(adev->pdev, 1, 1, flags);
>> - if (nvec > 0) {
>> - adev->irq.msi_enabled = true;
>> - dev_dbg(adev->dev, "using MSI/MSI-X.\n");
>> - }
>> + adev->irq.msi_enabled = true;
>> + dev_dbg(adev->dev, "using MSI/MSI-X.\n");
>> }
>>
>> INIT_WORK(&adev->irq.ih1_work, amdgpu_irq_handle_ih1);
>> @@ -302,22 +302,29 @@ int amdgpu_irq_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> /* Use vector 0 for MSI-X. */
>> r = pci_irq_vector(adev->pdev, 0);
>> if (r < 0)
>> - return r;
>> + goto free_vectors;
>> irq = r;
>>
>> /* PCI devices require shared interrupts. */
>> r = request_irq(irq, amdgpu_irq_handler, IRQF_SHARED, adev_to_drm(adev)->driver->name,
>> adev_to_drm(adev));
>> if (r)
>> - return r;
>> + goto free_vectors;
>> +
>> adev->irq.installed = true;
>> adev->irq.irq = irq;
>> adev_to_drm(adev)->max_vblank_count = 0x00ffffff;
>>
>> DRM_DEBUG("amdgpu: irq initialized.\n");
>> return 0;
>> -}
>>
>> +free_vectors:
>> + if (adev->irq.msi_enabled)
>> + pci_free_irq_vectors(adev->pdev);
>> +
>> + adev->irq.msi_enabled = false;
>> + return r;
>> +}
>>
>> void amdgpu_irq_fini_hw(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> {
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-06 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-06 6:55 [PATCH v2] drm/amd: Fix the flag setting code for interrupt request Ma Jun
2023-09-06 7:23 ` Christian König
2023-09-06 11:22 ` Ma, Jun [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=476e4c97-e0a9-8e56-57a4-411be1620da7@amd.com \
--to=majun@amd.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=Jun.Ma2@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox