From: "Zhang, Jerry (Junwei)" <Jerry.Zhang-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
"Shirish S" <shirish.s-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
Alexander.Deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org,
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: defer test IBs on the rings at boot (V3)
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:29:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5AD46CDC.3000902@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de47ee26-f07f-4e36-e55f-8d82aee9a2ef-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
On 04/16/2018 05:19 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 16.04.2018 um 11:04 schrieb Zhang, Jerry (Junwei):
>> On 04/16/2018 03:17 PM, Shirish S wrote:
>>> amdgpu_ib_ring_tests() runs test IB's on rings at boot
>>> contributes to ~500 ms of amdgpu driver's boot time.
>>>
>>> This patch defers it and ensures that its executed
>>> in amdgpu_info_ioctl() if it wasn't scheduled.
>>>
>>> V2: Use queue_delayed_work() & flush_delayed_work().
>>> V3: removed usage of separate wq, ensure ib tests is
>>> run before enabling clockgating.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shirish S <shirish.s@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 17 ++++++-----------
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c | 3 +++
>>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>> index 1762eb4..f225840 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>> @@ -1656,6 +1656,10 @@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_late_set_cg_state(struct
>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> if (amdgpu_emu_mode == 1)
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> + r = amdgpu_ib_ring_tests(adev);
>>> + if (r)
>>> + DRM_ERROR("ib ring test failed (%d).\n", r);
>>> +
>>
>> Just confirm:
>> IIRC, ib may not run immediately via scheduler thread.
>> Is there any possible that the actual ib ring test interferes cg enablement?
>
> No, the IB tests are run directly on the hardware ring and not through the
> scheduler.
>
> But even when we run them through the scheduler we wait for the to complete, so
> that shouldn't be an issue.
Thanks for explanation.
That's fine.
Jerry
>
> Christian.
>
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < adev->num_ip_blocks; i++) {
>>> if (!adev->ip_blocks[i].status.valid)
>>> continue;
>>> @@ -1706,8 +1710,8 @@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_late_init(struct
>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> - mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &adev->late_init_work,
>>> - msecs_to_jiffies(AMDGPU_RESUME_MS));
>>> + queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &adev->late_init_work,
>>> + msecs_to_jiffies(AMDGPU_RESUME_MS));
>>>
>>> amdgpu_device_fill_reset_magic(adev);
>>>
>>> @@ -2374,10 +2378,6 @@ int amdgpu_device_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> goto failed;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - r = amdgpu_ib_ring_tests(adev);
>>> - if (r)
>>> - DRM_ERROR("ib ring test failed (%d).\n", r);
>>> -
>>> if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev))
>>> amdgpu_virt_init_data_exchange(adev);
>>>
>>> @@ -2640,11 +2640,6 @@ int amdgpu_device_resume(struct drm_device *dev, bool
>>> resume, bool fbcon)
>>>
>>> amdgpu_fence_driver_resume(adev);
>>>
>>> - if (resume) {
>>> - r = amdgpu_ib_ring_tests(adev);
>>> - if (r)
>>> - DRM_ERROR("ib ring test failed (%d).\n", r);
>>> - }
>>>
>>> r = amdgpu_device_ip_late_init(adev);
>>> if (r)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
>>> index 487d39e..83d7160 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
>>> @@ -279,6 +279,9 @@ static int amdgpu_info_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
>>> *data, struct drm_file
>>> if (!info->return_size || !info->return_pointer)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> + /* Ensure IB tests are run on ring */
>>> + flush_delayed_work(&adev->late_init_work);
>>> +
>>> switch (info->query) {
>>> case AMDGPU_INFO_ACCEL_WORKING:
>>> ui32 = adev->accel_working;
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-16 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-16 7:17 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: defer test IBs on the rings at boot (V3) Shirish S
[not found] ` <1523863066-5199-1-git-send-email-shirish.s-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-04-16 8:33 ` Christian König
2018-04-16 9:04 ` Zhang, Jerry (Junwei)
[not found] ` <5AD46711.2030704-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-04-16 9:19 ` Christian König
[not found] ` <de47ee26-f07f-4e36-e55f-8d82aee9a2ef-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-04-16 9:29 ` Zhang, Jerry (Junwei) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5AD46CDC.3000902@amd.com \
--to=jerry.zhang-5c7gfcevmho@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
--cc=amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
--cc=christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shirish.s-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox