From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: "Michel Dänzer" <michel.daenzer@mailbox.org>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: always allocate cleared VRAM for GEM allocations
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:14:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <654328ee-5bdb-4de1-853f-55360e6ff39f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efd8495a-d869-4314-acfb-d3e704c68cda@mailbox.org>
Am 29.07.24 um 12:42 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> On 2024-07-26 17:25, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 9:50 AM Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> wrote:
>>> This adds allocation latency, but aligns better with user
>>> expectations. The latency should improve with the drm buddy
>>> clearing patches that Arun has been working on.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
>>> index ebb3f87ef4f6..768840e8937d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
>>> @@ -347,6 +347,10 @@ int amdgpu_gem_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + /* always clear VRAM */
>>> + if (args->in.domains & AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM)
>>> + flags |= AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CLEARED;
>> Alternatively, we can set AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_WIPE_ON_RELEASE here,
>> although for cases like reboots, we probably want clear on create.
> I agree. Thanks for doing this!
I strongly disagree. We have use cases were this will immediately become
a problem.
Especially we won't be able to hold latency requirements on boot for
certain projects any more.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
>
>
> BTW, maybe this allows reducing the use of AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_WIPE_ON_RELEASE, or even eliminating it altogether? Does this leave any way for user space to access uncleared VRAM?
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-29 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-26 13:41 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: always allocate cleared VRAM for GEM allocations Alex Deucher
2024-07-26 15:25 ` Alex Deucher
2024-07-29 10:42 ` Michel Dänzer
2024-07-29 11:14 ` Christian König [this message]
2024-07-29 15:41 ` Michel Dänzer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-23 13:36 Alex Deucher
2024-08-23 14:01 ` Christian König
2024-08-29 17:26 Alex Deucher
2024-08-29 18:09 ` Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin
2024-09-06 14:07 ` Marek Olšák
2024-09-06 17:53 ` Alex Deucher
2024-09-06 18:50 ` Marek Olšák
2024-09-10 6:10 ` Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=654328ee-5bdb-4de1-853f-55360e6ff39f@gmail.com \
--to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michel.daenzer@mailbox.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox