From: "Christian König" <deathsimple-ANTagKRnAhcb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
To: Tom St Denis <tstdenis82-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
Cc: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amd/amdgpu: Various tidy ups for gfx6
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 19:59:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7364a051-e423-57db-5a7f-d66d12cdeec7@vodafone.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160901174447.13037-4-tom.stdenis-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Am 01.09.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Tom St Denis:
> Various whitespace and logical simplifications for gfx6.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v6_0.c | 40 +++++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v6_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v6_0.c
> index 5f508c96496f..63ca77937714 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v6_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v6_0.c
> @@ -1211,11 +1211,8 @@ static void gfx_v6_0_gpu_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> SC_EARLYZ_TILE_FIFO_SIZE(adev->gfx.config.sc_earlyz_tile_fifo_size)));
>
> WREG32(VGT_NUM_INSTANCES, 1);
> -
> WREG32(CP_PERFMON_CNTL, 0);
> -
> WREG32(SQ_CONFIG, 0);
> -
> WREG32(PA_SC_FORCE_EOV_MAX_CNTS, (FORCE_EOV_MAX_CLK_CNT(4095) |
> FORCE_EOV_MAX_REZ_CNT(255)));
>
> @@ -1240,7 +1237,6 @@ static void gfx_v6_0_gpu_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> WREG32(PA_CL_ENHANCE, CLIP_VTX_REORDER_ENA | NUM_CLIP_SEQ(3));
>
> udelay(50);
> -
> }
>
>
> @@ -1661,21 +1657,14 @@ static int gfx_v6_0_cp_gfx_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>
> static u32 gfx_v6_0_ring_get_rptr_gfx(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> {
> - u32 rptr;
> -
> - rptr = ring->adev->wb.wb[ring->rptr_offs];
> -
> - return rptr;
> + return ring->adev->wb.wb[ring->rptr_offs];
> }
>
> static u32 gfx_v6_0_ring_get_wptr_gfx(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> {
> struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
> - u32 wptr;
>
> - wptr = RREG32(CP_RB0_WPTR);
> -
> - return wptr;
> + return RREG32(CP_RB0_WPTR);
> }
>
> static void gfx_v6_0_ring_set_wptr_gfx(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> @@ -1688,9 +1677,7 @@ static void gfx_v6_0_ring_set_wptr_gfx(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
>
> static u32 gfx_v6_0_ring_get_rptr_compute(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> {
> - u32 rptr = ring->adev->wb.wb[ring->rptr_offs];
> -
> - return rptr;
> + return ring->adev->wb.wb[ring->rptr_offs];
> }
Am I blind or are the gfx_v6_0_ring_get_rptr_compute() and
gfx_v6_0_ring_get_rptr_gfx() functions identical?
If that's true might be a good idea to just use one function.
Either way patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Christian.
>
> static u32 gfx_v6_0_ring_get_wptr_compute(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> @@ -1770,14 +1757,12 @@ static int gfx_v6_0_cp_compute_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> ring->wptr = 0;
> WREG32(CP_RB1_WPTR, ring->wptr);
>
> -
> rptr_addr = adev->wb.gpu_addr + (ring->rptr_offs * 4);
> WREG32(CP_RB1_RPTR_ADDR, lower_32_bits(rptr_addr));
> WREG32(CP_RB1_RPTR_ADDR_HI, upper_32_bits(rptr_addr) & 0xFF);
>
> mdelay(1);
> WREG32(CP_RB1_CNTL, tmp);
> -
> WREG32(CP_RB1_BASE, ring->gpu_addr >> 8);
>
> ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[1];
> @@ -1797,7 +1782,6 @@ static int gfx_v6_0_cp_compute_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>
> mdelay(1);
> WREG32(CP_RB2_CNTL, tmp);
> -
> WREG32(CP_RB2_BASE, ring->gpu_addr >> 8);
>
> adev->gfx.compute_ring[0].ready = true;
> @@ -1825,12 +1809,7 @@ static void gfx_v6_0_cp_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable)
>
> static int gfx_v6_0_cp_load_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> {
> - int r;
> -
> - r = gfx_v6_0_cp_gfx_load_microcode(adev);
> -
> - return r;
> -
> + return gfx_v6_0_cp_gfx_load_microcode(adev);
> }
>
> static void gfx_v6_0_enable_gui_idle_interrupt(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> @@ -2172,7 +2151,6 @@ static void gfx_v6_0_rlc_stop(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> WREG32(RLC_CNTL, 0);
>
> gfx_v6_0_enable_gui_idle_interrupt(adev, false);
> -
> gfx_v6_0_wait_for_rlc_serdes(adev);
> }
>
> @@ -2223,11 +2201,8 @@ static int gfx_v6_0_rlc_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> gfx_v6_0_rlc_stop(adev);
> -
> gfx_v6_0_rlc_reset(adev);
> -
> gfx_v6_0_init_pg(adev);
> -
> gfx_v6_0_init_cg(adev);
>
> WREG32(RLC_RL_BASE, 0);
> @@ -2254,7 +2229,6 @@ static int gfx_v6_0_rlc_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> WREG32(RLC_UCODE_ADDR, 0);
>
> gfx_v6_0_enable_lbpw(adev, gfx_v6_0_lbpw_supported(adev));
> -
> gfx_v6_0_rlc_start(adev);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -2278,7 +2252,6 @@ static void gfx_v6_0_enable_cgcg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable)
> WREG32(RLC_SERDES_WR_CTRL, 0x00b000ff);
>
> gfx_v6_0_wait_for_rlc_serdes(adev);
> -
> gfx_v6_0_update_rlc(adev, tmp);
>
> WREG32(RLC_SERDES_WR_CTRL, 0x007000ff);
> @@ -2931,13 +2904,10 @@ static bool gfx_v6_0_is_idle(void *handle)
> static int gfx_v6_0_wait_for_idle(void *handle)
> {
> unsigned i;
> - u32 tmp;
> struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
>
> for (i = 0; i < adev->usec_timeout; i++) {
> - tmp = RREG32(GRBM_STATUS) & GRBM_STATUS__GUI_ACTIVE_MASK;
> -
> - if (!tmp)
> + if (gfx_v6_0_is_idle(handle))
> return 0;
> udelay(1);
> }
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-01 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-01 17:44 Various fixes for gfx6 Tom St Denis
[not found] ` <20160901174447.13037-1-tom.stdenis-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-01 17:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/amd/amdgpu: Add GRBM lock to various SI functions Tom St Denis
[not found] ` <20160901174447.13037-2-tom.stdenis-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-01 17:57 ` Christian König
2016-09-01 17:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/amd/amdgpu: Simplify mask creation in gfx6 Tom St Denis
2016-09-01 17:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/amd/amdgpu: Various tidy ups for gfx6 Tom St Denis
[not found] ` <20160901174447.13037-4-tom.stdenis-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-01 17:59 ` Christian König [this message]
[not found] ` <7364a051-e423-57db-5a7f-d66d12cdeec7-ANTagKRnAhcb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-02 11:54 ` StDenis, Tom
[not found] ` <CY4PR12MB1768BF04DBC2C421B0FC969FF7E50-rpdhrqHFk06yjjPBNVDk/QdYzm3356FpvxpqHgZTriW3zl9H0oFU5g@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-02 12:06 ` Christian König
[not found] ` <aa1ac326-ed57-21f5-df8f-5ceb4ae32ae8-ANTagKRnAhcb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-02 12:08 ` StDenis, Tom
2016-09-02 3:22 ` Edward O'Callaghan
[not found] ` <717365b4-0cdd-95a4-9e8c-4b04660844c6-dczkZgxz+BNUPWh3PAxdjQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-02 12:06 ` StDenis, Tom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7364a051-e423-57db-5a7f-d66d12cdeec7@vodafone.de \
--to=deathsimple-antagkrnahcb1svskn2v4q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tom.stdenis-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tstdenis82-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox