AMD-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
	Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: stylon.wang@amd.com, haoping.liu@amd.com,
	srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com, sunpeng.li@amd.com,
	Qingqing.Zhuo@amd.com, Xinhui.Pan@amd.com,
	Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com, daniel.wheeler@amd.com,
	aurabindo.pillai@amd.com, hersenxs.wu@amd.com,
	hamza.mahfooz@amd.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, wayne.lin@amd.com,
	alexander.deucher@amd.com, airlied@gmail.com,
	christian.koenig@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Remove unwanted drm edid references
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 18:14:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87led7v58l.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39a7f19a-e6b6-4962-b7e0-4f33cb78938c@amd.com>

On Fri, 15 Sep 2023, Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> wrote:
> On 2023-09-05 13:13, Alex Hung wrote:
>> [WHY]
>> edid_override and drm_edid_override_connector_update, according to drm
>> documentation, should not be referred outside drm_edid.
>> 
>> [HOW]
>> Remove and replace them accordingly.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 23 ++-----------------
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> index 1bb1a394f55f..f6a255773242 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> @@ -6372,15 +6372,12 @@ amdgpu_dm_connector_late_register(struct drm_connector *connector)
>>  static void amdgpu_dm_connector_funcs_force(struct drm_connector *connector)
>>  {
>>  	struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector = to_amdgpu_dm_connector(connector);
>> +	struct amdgpu_connector *amdgpu_connector = to_amdgpu_connector(connector);
>>  	struct dc_link *dc_link = aconnector->dc_link;
>>  	struct dc_sink *dc_em_sink = aconnector->dc_em_sink;
>>  	struct edid *edid;
>>  
>> -	if (!connector->edid_override)
>> -		return;
>> -
>> -	drm_edid_override_connector_update(&aconnector->base);
>> -	edid = aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr->data;
>> +	edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &amdgpu_connector->ddc_bus->aux.ddc);
>
> Looks like we only call this in the case where a connector is forced, so
> drm_get_edid will never try to read the edid from the ddc but always gives
> us the override_edid. Please spell that out in the commit description so
> anyone else looking at the patch doesn't have to trace it themselves.

Connector forcing is only about forcing the connector status. The probe
helper will call ->force instead of ->detect.

But this has nothing to do with override_edid. That's completely
orthogonal.

Here, you can call drm_get_edid() if you like. Connector forcing just
bypasses the DDC probe for determining connector status. If connector is
forced off, you won't get the EDID, regardless of override/firmware
EDID, but if it's forced on, the EDID read proceeds.

And the EDID read has the priority order 1) override EDID if set via
edid_override debugfs, 2) firmware EDID if set via edid_firmware module
parameter, and 3) regular DDC read.

BR,
Jani.

>
>>  	aconnector->edid = edid;
>>  
>>  	/* Update emulated (virtual) sink's EDID */
>> @@ -6421,22 +6418,6 @@ static void create_eml_sink(struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector)
>>  	};
>>  	struct edid *edid;
>>  
>> -	if (!aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr) {
>
> Can edid_blob_ptr never be NULL?
>
> Harry
>
>> -		/* if connector->edid_override valid, pass
>> -		 * it to edid_override to edid_blob_ptr
>> -		 */
>> -
>> -		drm_edid_override_connector_update(&aconnector->base);
>> -
>> -		if (!aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr) {
>> -			DRM_ERROR("No EDID firmware found on connector: %s ,forcing to OFF!\n",
>> -					aconnector->base.name);
>> -
>> -			aconnector->base.force = DRM_FORCE_OFF;
>> -			return;
>> -		}
>> -	}
>> -
>>  	edid = (struct edid *) aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr->data;
>>  
>>  	aconnector->edid = edid;
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

      reply	other threads:[~2023-09-15 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-05 17:13 [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Remove unwanted drm edid references Alex Hung
2023-09-11  8:42 ` Jani Nikula
2023-09-15 13:47 ` Harry Wentland
2023-09-15 15:14   ` Jani Nikula [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87led7v58l.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=Qingqing.Zhuo@amd.com \
    --cc=Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com \
    --cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex.hung@amd.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=aurabindo.pillai@amd.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.wheeler@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hamza.mahfooz@amd.com \
    --cc=haoping.liu@amd.com \
    --cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
    --cc=hersenxs.wu@amd.com \
    --cc=srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com \
    --cc=stylon.wang@amd.com \
    --cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
    --cc=wayne.lin@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox