From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: stylon.wang@amd.com, haoping.liu@amd.com,
srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com, sunpeng.li@amd.com,
Qingqing.Zhuo@amd.com, Xinhui.Pan@amd.com,
Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com, daniel.wheeler@amd.com,
aurabindo.pillai@amd.com, hersenxs.wu@amd.com,
hamza.mahfooz@amd.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, wayne.lin@amd.com,
alexander.deucher@amd.com, airlied@gmail.com,
christian.koenig@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Remove unwanted drm edid references
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 18:14:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87led7v58l.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39a7f19a-e6b6-4962-b7e0-4f33cb78938c@amd.com>
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023, Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> wrote:
> On 2023-09-05 13:13, Alex Hung wrote:
>> [WHY]
>> edid_override and drm_edid_override_connector_update, according to drm
>> documentation, should not be referred outside drm_edid.
>>
>> [HOW]
>> Remove and replace them accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
>> ---
>> .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 23 ++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> index 1bb1a394f55f..f6a255773242 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> @@ -6372,15 +6372,12 @@ amdgpu_dm_connector_late_register(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> static void amdgpu_dm_connector_funcs_force(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> {
>> struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector = to_amdgpu_dm_connector(connector);
>> + struct amdgpu_connector *amdgpu_connector = to_amdgpu_connector(connector);
>> struct dc_link *dc_link = aconnector->dc_link;
>> struct dc_sink *dc_em_sink = aconnector->dc_em_sink;
>> struct edid *edid;
>>
>> - if (!connector->edid_override)
>> - return;
>> -
>> - drm_edid_override_connector_update(&aconnector->base);
>> - edid = aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr->data;
>> + edid = drm_get_edid(connector, &amdgpu_connector->ddc_bus->aux.ddc);
>
> Looks like we only call this in the case where a connector is forced, so
> drm_get_edid will never try to read the edid from the ddc but always gives
> us the override_edid. Please spell that out in the commit description so
> anyone else looking at the patch doesn't have to trace it themselves.
Connector forcing is only about forcing the connector status. The probe
helper will call ->force instead of ->detect.
But this has nothing to do with override_edid. That's completely
orthogonal.
Here, you can call drm_get_edid() if you like. Connector forcing just
bypasses the DDC probe for determining connector status. If connector is
forced off, you won't get the EDID, regardless of override/firmware
EDID, but if it's forced on, the EDID read proceeds.
And the EDID read has the priority order 1) override EDID if set via
edid_override debugfs, 2) firmware EDID if set via edid_firmware module
parameter, and 3) regular DDC read.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> aconnector->edid = edid;
>>
>> /* Update emulated (virtual) sink's EDID */
>> @@ -6421,22 +6418,6 @@ static void create_eml_sink(struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector)
>> };
>> struct edid *edid;
>>
>> - if (!aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr) {
>
> Can edid_blob_ptr never be NULL?
>
> Harry
>
>> - /* if connector->edid_override valid, pass
>> - * it to edid_override to edid_blob_ptr
>> - */
>> -
>> - drm_edid_override_connector_update(&aconnector->base);
>> -
>> - if (!aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr) {
>> - DRM_ERROR("No EDID firmware found on connector: %s ,forcing to OFF!\n",
>> - aconnector->base.name);
>> -
>> - aconnector->base.force = DRM_FORCE_OFF;
>> - return;
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> edid = (struct edid *) aconnector->base.edid_blob_ptr->data;
>>
>> aconnector->edid = edid;
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-15 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-05 17:13 [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Remove unwanted drm edid references Alex Hung
2023-09-11 8:42 ` Jani Nikula
2023-09-15 13:47 ` Harry Wentland
2023-09-15 15:14 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87led7v58l.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=Qingqing.Zhuo@amd.com \
--cc=Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.hung@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=aurabindo.pillai@amd.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel.wheeler@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hamza.mahfooz@amd.com \
--cc=haoping.liu@amd.com \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=hersenxs.wu@amd.com \
--cc=srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com \
--cc=stylon.wang@amd.com \
--cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
--cc=wayne.lin@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox