From: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
To: Philip Yang <yangp@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
christian.koenig@amd.com
Cc: Kent.Russell@amd.com, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.ibm.com>,
Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya <mkchauras@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/8] drm/amdkfd: Relax size checking during queue buffer get
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 15:42:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b2805da-e0e1-42df-b200-05d6e14b4c30@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64013bb5-9510-4a29-873e-b23d59c494db@amd.com>
On 12/16/25 1:55 AM, Philip Yang wrote:
>
>
> On 2025-12-12 01:40, Donet Tom wrote:
>> HW-supported EOP buffer sizes are 4K and 32K. On systems that do not
>> use 4K pages, the minimum buffer object (BO) allocation size is
>> PAGE_SIZE (for example, 64K). During queue buffer acquisition, the
>> driver
>> currently checks the allocated BO size against the supported EOP buffer
>> size. Since the allocated BO is larger than the expected size, this
>> check
>> fails, preventing queue creation.
>>
>> Relax the strict size validation and allow PAGE_SIZE-sized BOs to be
>> used.
>> Only the required 4K region of the buffer will be used as the EOP buffer
>> and avoids queue creation failures on non-4K page systems.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_queue.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_queue.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_queue.c
>> index f1e7583650c4..dc857450fa16 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_queue.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_queue.c
>> @@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ int kfd_queue_buffer_get(struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>> void __user *addr, struct amdgpu_
>> struct amdgpu_bo_va_mapping *mapping;
>> u64 user_addr;
>> u64 size;
>> + u64 bo_size;
>> user_addr = (u64)addr >> AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SHIFT;
>> size = expected_size >> AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SHIFT;
>> @@ -207,11 +208,12 @@ int kfd_queue_buffer_get(struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>> void __user *addr, struct amdgpu_
>> if (!mapping)
>> goto out_err;
>> - if (user_addr != mapping->start ||
>> - (size != 0 && user_addr + size - 1 != mapping->last)) {
>> - pr_debug("expected size 0x%llx not equal to mapping addr
>> 0x%llx size 0x%llx\n",
>> + bo_size = mapping->last - mapping->start + 1;
>> +
>> + if (user_addr != mapping->start || (size != 0 && bo_size < size)) {
>> + pr_debug("expected size 0x%llx grater than mapping addr
>> 0x%llx size 0x%llx\n",
>> expected_size, mapping->start << AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SHIFT,
>> - (mapping->last - mapping->start + 1) <<
>> AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SHIFT);
>> + bo_size << AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SHIFT);
> This change works, but also relax the size validation for ring buffer
> size etc, this may have side effect,
> for example FW and user space should have the same ring buffer size.
>
> Other buffers already use PAGE_SIZE as expected size or size aligned
> to PAGE_SIZE, maybe only relax the eop buffer
> size check
>
> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ int kfd_queue_acquire_buffers(struct
> kfd_process_device *pdd, struct queue_prope
>
> /* EOP buffer is not required for all ASICs */
> if (properties->eop_ring_buffer_address) {
> - if (properties->eop_ring_buffer_size !=
> topo_dev->node_props.eop_buffer_size) {
> + if (properties->eop_ring_buffer_size <
> topo_dev->node_props.eop_buffer_size) {
> pr_debug("queue eop bo size 0x%x not equal to
> node eop buf size 0x%x\n",
> properties->eop_ring_buffer_size,
> topo_dev->node_props.eop_buffer_size);
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ int kfd_queue_acquire_buffers(struct
> kfd_process_device *pdd, struct queue_prope
> }
> err = kfd_queue_buffer_get(vm, (void
> *)properties->eop_ring_buffer_address,
> &properties->eop_buf_bo,
> - properties->eop_ring_buffer_size);
> + ALIGN(properties->eop_ring_buffer_size, PAGE_SIZE));
> if (err)
> goto out_err_unreserve;
> }
Thank you. I will make this change in next version.
>
> Regards,
> Philip
>> goto out_err;
>> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-16 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-12 6:40 [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] amdgpu/amdkfd: Add support for non-4K page size systems Donet Tom
2025-12-12 6:40 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/8] drm/amdkfd: Relax size checking during queue buffer get Donet Tom
2025-12-15 20:25 ` Philip Yang
2025-12-16 10:12 ` Donet Tom [this message]
2025-12-12 6:40 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/8] amdkfd/kfd_svm: Fix SVM map/unmap address conversion for non-4k page sizes Donet Tom
2025-12-15 20:44 ` Philip Yang
2025-12-16 10:09 ` Donet Tom
2025-12-12 6:40 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/8] amdkfd/kfd_migrate: Fix GART PTE for non-4K pagesize in svm_migrate_gart_map() Donet Tom
2025-12-15 21:03 ` Philip Yang
2025-12-12 6:40 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm: Fix AMDGPU_GTT_MAX_TRANSFER_SIZE for non-4K page size Donet Tom
2025-12-12 8:53 ` Christian König
2025-12-12 12:14 ` Donet Tom
2026-01-06 12:55 ` Donet Tom
2026-01-08 12:31 ` Christian König
2026-01-09 10:22 ` Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer
2026-01-09 12:57 ` Donet Tom
2025-12-12 6:40 ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/8] amdkfd/kfd_chardev: Add error message for non-4k pagesize failures Donet Tom
2025-12-12 6:40 ` [RFC PATCH v1 6/8] drm/amdgpu: Handle GPU page faults correctly on non-4K page systems Donet Tom
2025-12-12 6:40 ` [RFC PATCH v1 7/8] amdgpu: Align ctl_stack_size and wg_data_size to GPU page size instead of CPU page size Donet Tom
2025-12-12 9:04 ` Christian König
2025-12-12 12:29 ` Donet Tom
2025-12-19 10:27 ` Donet Tom
2026-01-06 13:01 ` Donet Tom
2025-12-12 6:40 ` [RFC PATCH v1 8/8] amdgpu: Fix MQD and control stack alignment for non-4K CPU page size systems Donet Tom
2025-12-12 9:01 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] amdgpu/amdkfd: Add support for non-4K " Christian König
2025-12-12 10:45 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-12-12 13:01 ` Christian König
2025-12-12 17:24 ` Alex Deucher
2025-12-15 9:47 ` Christian König
2025-12-15 10:11 ` Donet Tom
2025-12-15 16:11 ` Christian König
2025-12-16 10:08 ` Donet Tom
2025-12-16 16:06 ` Christian König
2025-12-17 9:04 ` Donet Tom
2025-12-17 9:46 ` Donet Tom
2025-12-17 10:10 ` Christian König
2025-12-15 14:09 ` Alex Deucher
2025-12-16 13:54 ` Donet Tom
2025-12-16 14:02 ` Alex Deucher
2025-12-17 9:03 ` Donet Tom
2025-12-17 14:23 ` Alex Deucher
2025-12-17 21:31 ` Yat Sin, David
2026-01-02 18:53 ` Donet Tom
2026-01-06 12:58 ` Donet Tom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b2805da-e0e1-42df-b200-05d6e14b4c30@linux.ibm.com \
--to=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Kent.Russell@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=mkchauras@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yangp@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox