Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/amd/pm: drop unnecessary feature->mutex lock protections(V2)

["Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>]

The explanation sounds sane, but since I don't know the affected code at 
all the series is only Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

Maybe wait for Alex to give you an rb if you are unsure, otherwise feel 
free to commit.

Christian.

Am 27.08.20 um 08:39 schrieb Nirmoy:
> Series is Acked-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>
>
> On 8/25/20 9:49 AM, Evan Quan wrote:
>> As these operations are performed in hardware setup and there
>> is actually no race conditions during this period considering:
>> 1. the hardware setup is serial and cannnot be in parallel
>> 2. all other operations can be performed only after hardware
>>     setup complete.
>>
>> V2: rich the commit log description
>>
>> Change-Id: I096d7ab0855ff59b0ecb56fd9d6d9946b3605fc8
>> Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c      | 4 ----
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c | 2 --
>>   2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
>> index 09dc5303762b..b7cad8ef6153 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
>> @@ -361,20 +361,16 @@ static int 
>> smu_get_driver_allowed_feature_mask(struct smu_context *smu)
>>       int ret = 0;
>>       uint32_t allowed_feature_mask[SMU_FEATURE_MAX/32];
>>   -    mutex_lock(&feature->mutex);
>>       bitmap_zero(feature->allowed, SMU_FEATURE_MAX);
>> -    mutex_unlock(&feature->mutex);
>>         ret = smu_get_allowed_feature_mask(smu, allowed_feature_mask,
>>                            SMU_FEATURE_MAX/32);
>>       if (ret)
>>           return ret;
>>   -    mutex_lock(&feature->mutex);
>>       bitmap_or(feature->allowed, feature->allowed,
>>                 (unsigned long *)allowed_feature_mask,
>>                 feature->feature_num);
>> -    mutex_unlock(&feature->mutex);
>>         return ret;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
>> index 548db1edd352..28a19ffd22a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
>> @@ -721,7 +721,6 @@ int smu_v11_0_set_allowed_mask(struct smu_context 
>> *smu)
>>       int ret = 0;
>>       uint32_t feature_mask[2];
>>   -    mutex_lock(&feature->mutex);
>>       if (bitmap_empty(feature->allowed, SMU_FEATURE_MAX) || 
>> feature->feature_num < 64)
>>           goto failed;
>>   @@ -738,7 +737,6 @@ int smu_v11_0_set_allowed_mask(struct 
>> smu_context *smu)
>>           goto failed;
>>     failed:
>> -    mutex_unlock(&feature->mutex);
>>       return ret;
>>   }
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx