From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>,
Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>,
Pan Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>
Cc: Le Ma <le.ma@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Use READ_ONCE() when reading the values in 'sdma_v4_4_2_ring_get_rptr'
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 11:53:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a060ac78-2565-4dec-1573-1ee0645603a5@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e438e5fc-6088-3d45-f651-0ffa27af3ba1@amd.com>
Yes, that's a very good idea as well. Going to keep that link around if
anybody asks why we do this.
Christian.
Am 21.08.23 um 22:49 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
> Would it make sense to include a link to a better explanation of the
> underlying issue? E.g. https://lwn.net/Articles/624126/?
>
> Regards,
> Felix
>
>
> On 2023-08-21 07:23, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 04.08.23 um 07:46 schrieb Srinivasan Shanmugam:
>>> Instead of declaring pointers use READ_ONCE(), when accessing those
>>> values to make sure that the compiler doesn't voilate any cache
>>> coherences
>>
>> That commit message is a bit confusing and not 100% technically correct.
>>
>> The compiler is not causing any cache coherency issues, but
>> potentially re-ordering things or reading the value multiple times.
>>
>> Just write something like "Use READ_ONCE() instead of declaring the
>> pointer volatile.". The background explanation would exceed the
>> information suitable for a commit message anyway.
>>
>> Apart from that looks good to me,
>> Christian.
>>
>>>
>>> Cc: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
>>> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>>> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>>> Cc: "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>
>>> Cc: Le Ma <le.ma@amd.com>
>>> Cc: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_4_2.c | 8 ++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_4_2.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_4_2.c
>>> index f413898dda37..267c1b7b8dcd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_4_2.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_4_2.c
>>> @@ -154,13 +154,13 @@ static int sdma_v4_4_2_init_microcode(struct
>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> */
>>> static uint64_t sdma_v4_4_2_ring_get_rptr(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
>>> {
>>> - u64 *rptr;
>>> + u64 rptr;
>>> /* XXX check if swapping is necessary on BE */
>>> - rptr = ((u64 *)&ring->adev->wb.wb[ring->rptr_offs]);
>>> + rptr = READ_ONCE(*((u64 *)&ring->adev->wb.wb[ring->rptr_offs]));
>>> - DRM_DEBUG("rptr before shift == 0x%016llx\n", *rptr);
>>> - return ((*rptr) >> 2);
>>> + DRM_DEBUG("rptr before shift == 0x%016llx\n", rptr);
>>> + return rptr >> 2;
>>> }
>>> /**
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-22 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-04 5:46 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Use READ_ONCE() when reading the values in 'sdma_v4_4_2_ring_get_rptr' Srinivasan Shanmugam
2023-08-18 11:26 ` Ma, Le
2023-08-21 11:23 ` Christian König
2023-08-21 20:49 ` Felix Kuehling
2023-08-22 9:53 ` Christian König [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a060ac78-2565-4dec-1573-1ee0645603a5@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Hawking.Zhang@amd.com \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=guchun.chen@amd.com \
--cc=le.ma@amd.com \
--cc=srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox